Maxillary sinus floor augmentation: comparing osteotome with lateral window immediate and delayed implant placements. An interim report
Само за регистроване кориснике
2008
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
Objective. A retrospective study was performed to observe clinical outcomes of dental implants placed in augmented maxillary sinuses using an osteotome or a lateral approach technique with synchronous or delayed implant placement. Study design. A total of 61 patients were enrolled in the study. The distribution and frequency of sinus augmentation techniques and implant placements were evaluated according to the implant site and Cawood-Howell classifications. The implant survival rates were assessed clinically and radiographically over a minimum of 3 years of follow-up. Results. The number of implants placed was fewer in the molar region compared with the premolar region and was independent of the surgical techniques used. Significantly fewer implants were placed in implant site class D and Cawood-Howell class V. Optimal survival rates were evident in all groups, with no significant changes. Conclusion. The most predictable region for sinus augmentation with simultaneous implant placeme...nt was the maxillary premolar area. All 80 implants were successful using either osteotome or lateral approaches to augment the maxillary sinus floor. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106: 820-827)
Извор:
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology & Endodontology, 2008, 106, 6, 820-827Издавач:
- Mosby-Elsevier, New York
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.04.025
ISSN: 1079-2104
PubMed: 18602304
WoS: 000260758000007
Scopus: 2-s2.0-55749104932
Колекције
Институција/група
Stomatološki fakultetTY - JOUR AU - Jurišić, Milan AU - Marković, Aleksa AU - Radulović, Milan AU - Brković, Božidar AU - Sandor, George K.B. PY - 2008 UR - https://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1449 AB - Objective. A retrospective study was performed to observe clinical outcomes of dental implants placed in augmented maxillary sinuses using an osteotome or a lateral approach technique with synchronous or delayed implant placement. Study design. A total of 61 patients were enrolled in the study. The distribution and frequency of sinus augmentation techniques and implant placements were evaluated according to the implant site and Cawood-Howell classifications. The implant survival rates were assessed clinically and radiographically over a minimum of 3 years of follow-up. Results. The number of implants placed was fewer in the molar region compared with the premolar region and was independent of the surgical techniques used. Significantly fewer implants were placed in implant site class D and Cawood-Howell class V. Optimal survival rates were evident in all groups, with no significant changes. Conclusion. The most predictable region for sinus augmentation with simultaneous implant placement was the maxillary premolar area. All 80 implants were successful using either osteotome or lateral approaches to augment the maxillary sinus floor. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106: 820-827) PB - Mosby-Elsevier, New York T2 - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology & Endodontology T1 - Maxillary sinus floor augmentation: comparing osteotome with lateral window immediate and delayed implant placements. An interim report VL - 106 IS - 6 SP - 820 EP - 827 DO - 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.04.025 ER -
@article{ author = "Jurišić, Milan and Marković, Aleksa and Radulović, Milan and Brković, Božidar and Sandor, George K.B.", year = "2008", abstract = "Objective. A retrospective study was performed to observe clinical outcomes of dental implants placed in augmented maxillary sinuses using an osteotome or a lateral approach technique with synchronous or delayed implant placement. Study design. A total of 61 patients were enrolled in the study. The distribution and frequency of sinus augmentation techniques and implant placements were evaluated according to the implant site and Cawood-Howell classifications. The implant survival rates were assessed clinically and radiographically over a minimum of 3 years of follow-up. Results. The number of implants placed was fewer in the molar region compared with the premolar region and was independent of the surgical techniques used. Significantly fewer implants were placed in implant site class D and Cawood-Howell class V. Optimal survival rates were evident in all groups, with no significant changes. Conclusion. The most predictable region for sinus augmentation with simultaneous implant placement was the maxillary premolar area. All 80 implants were successful using either osteotome or lateral approaches to augment the maxillary sinus floor. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106: 820-827)", publisher = "Mosby-Elsevier, New York", journal = "Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology & Endodontology", title = "Maxillary sinus floor augmentation: comparing osteotome with lateral window immediate and delayed implant placements. An interim report", volume = "106", number = "6", pages = "820-827", doi = "10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.04.025" }
Jurišić, M., Marković, A., Radulović, M., Brković, B.,& Sandor, G. K.B.. (2008). Maxillary sinus floor augmentation: comparing osteotome with lateral window immediate and delayed implant placements. An interim report. in Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology & Endodontology Mosby-Elsevier, New York., 106(6), 820-827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.04.025
Jurišić M, Marković A, Radulović M, Brković B, Sandor GK. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation: comparing osteotome with lateral window immediate and delayed implant placements. An interim report. in Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology & Endodontology. 2008;106(6):820-827. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.04.025 .
Jurišić, Milan, Marković, Aleksa, Radulović, Milan, Brković, Božidar, Sandor, George K.B., "Maxillary sinus floor augmentation: comparing osteotome with lateral window immediate and delayed implant placements. An interim report" in Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology & Endodontology, 106, no. 6 (2008):820-827, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.04.025 . .