TY  - JOUR
AU  - Beloica, Miloš
AU  - Goracci, Cecilia
AU  - Ramos Carvalho, Carlos Augusto
AU  - Radović, Ivana
AU  - Margvelashvili, Mariam
AU  - Vulićević, Zoran
AU  - Ferrari, Marco
PY  - 2010
UR  - https://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1581
AB  - Purpose To determine the bond strength to unground enamel of all in one adhesives in comparison with an etch and rinse system and to compare the reliability of microtensile and microshear methods in providing such measurements Materials and Methods The bonding procedure was performed on enamel of 64 extracted molars The tested all in one adhesives were Bond Force (Tokuyama), AdheSE One (Ivoclar Vivadent) and Xeno V (Dentsply) Prime&Bond NT (Dentsply) served as control Microtensile specimens were obtained from 4 teeth per group Twelve teeth per group were used for microshear testing Microtensile specimens that failed prior to testing were included in statistical calculations, they were assigned the lowest value measured in the respective group Failure modes were observed under light microscope and classified (cohesive within substrates, adhesive mixed) Statistically significant differences in bond strength were assessed among the adhesives within each testing method and between microshear and microtensile data for each adhesive Failure mode distributions were compared using the chi square test Results All in-one adhesives had similar microshear and microtensile bond strengths In both testing methods, the etch and rinse system achieved the strongest bond For all adhesives significantly higher bond strengths were measured with the microshear test In microtensile testing specimens bonded with the etch and rinse adhesive exhibited a significantly different distribution of failure modes The coefficients of variation were extremely high for microtensile bond strength data, particularly of all in one adhesives Conclusion The adhesive potential to intact enamel of recently introduced all in-one adhesives was inferior to that of an etch and rinse system When testing bond strength to enamel of all in one adhesives, microshear testing may be a more accurate method than microtensile
PB  - Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, Hanover Park
T2  - Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
T1  - Microtensile vs Microshear Bond Strength of All-in-One Adhesives to Unground Enamel
VL  - 12
IS  - 6
SP  - 427
EP  - 433
DO  - 10.3290/j.jad.a18237
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Beloica, Miloš and Goracci, Cecilia and Ramos Carvalho, Carlos Augusto and Radović, Ivana and Margvelashvili, Mariam and Vulićević, Zoran and Ferrari, Marco",
year = "2010",
abstract = "Purpose To determine the bond strength to unground enamel of all in one adhesives in comparison with an etch and rinse system and to compare the reliability of microtensile and microshear methods in providing such measurements Materials and Methods The bonding procedure was performed on enamel of 64 extracted molars The tested all in one adhesives were Bond Force (Tokuyama), AdheSE One (Ivoclar Vivadent) and Xeno V (Dentsply) Prime&Bond NT (Dentsply) served as control Microtensile specimens were obtained from 4 teeth per group Twelve teeth per group were used for microshear testing Microtensile specimens that failed prior to testing were included in statistical calculations, they were assigned the lowest value measured in the respective group Failure modes were observed under light microscope and classified (cohesive within substrates, adhesive mixed) Statistically significant differences in bond strength were assessed among the adhesives within each testing method and between microshear and microtensile data for each adhesive Failure mode distributions were compared using the chi square test Results All in-one adhesives had similar microshear and microtensile bond strengths In both testing methods, the etch and rinse system achieved the strongest bond For all adhesives significantly higher bond strengths were measured with the microshear test In microtensile testing specimens bonded with the etch and rinse adhesive exhibited a significantly different distribution of failure modes The coefficients of variation were extremely high for microtensile bond strength data, particularly of all in one adhesives Conclusion The adhesive potential to intact enamel of recently introduced all in-one adhesives was inferior to that of an etch and rinse system When testing bond strength to enamel of all in one adhesives, microshear testing may be a more accurate method than microtensile",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, Hanover Park",
journal = "Journal of Adhesive Dentistry",
title = "Microtensile vs Microshear Bond Strength of All-in-One Adhesives to Unground Enamel",
volume = "12",
number = "6",
pages = "427-433",
doi = "10.3290/j.jad.a18237"
}

Beloica, M., Goracci, C., Ramos Carvalho, C. A., Radović, I., Margvelashvili, M., Vulićević, Z.,& Ferrari, M.. (2010). Microtensile vs Microshear Bond Strength of All-in-One Adhesives to Unground Enamel. in Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, Hanover Park., 12(6), 427-433.
https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a18237

Beloica M, Goracci C, Ramos Carvalho CA, Radović I, Margvelashvili M, Vulićević Z, Ferrari M. Microtensile vs Microshear Bond Strength of All-in-One Adhesives to Unground Enamel. in Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2010;12(6):427-433.
doi:10.3290/j.jad.a18237 .

Beloica, Miloš, Goracci, Cecilia, Ramos Carvalho, Carlos Augusto, Radović, Ivana, Margvelashvili, Mariam, Vulićević, Zoran, Ferrari, Marco, "Microtensile vs Microshear Bond Strength of All-in-One Adhesives to Unground Enamel" in Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 12, no. 6 (2010):427-433,
https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a18237 . .