Schiavetti, R.

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
ce20156f-1047-4560-830e-0625202c6130
  • Schiavetti, R. (1)
Projects
No records found.

Author's Bibliography

The influence of cement filler load on the radiopacity of various fibre posts ex vivo

Goracci, Cecilia; Juloski, Jelena; Schiavetti, R.; Mainieri, P.; Giovannetti, Agostino; Vichi, Alessandro; Ferrari, Marco

(Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, 2015)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Goracci, Cecilia
AU  - Juloski, Jelena
AU  - Schiavetti, R.
AU  - Mainieri, P.
AU  - Giovannetti, Agostino
AU  - Vichi, Alessandro
AU  - Ferrari, Marco
PY  - 2015
UR  - https://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2024
AB  - Aim To verify whether the filler load of luting agents influences the radiopacity of intraradicularly placed posts. Methodology Digital radiographs of the following posts were taken: RelyX Fiber Post (3M ESPE), GC Fiber Post (GC Corporation), DT Light Post Illusion (RTD), DT Light SL Post (RTD), Endo-Composipost (RTD), FibreKleer Parallel Post (Jeneric Pentron Incorporated), FRC Postec (Ivoclar Vivadent), Parapost Taper Lux (Coltene/Whaledent AG), Radix Fiber Post (Dentsply Maillefer), EverStick Post (Stick Tech Ltd), Dentin Post X (Komet), Tech 21 X-op (Isasan), ENA Post (Micerium). Post radiopacity was measured in millimetres of aluminium (mmAl) with reference to an aluminium step wedge. Two extracted contralateral premolars were root filled. After post space preparation, taking the midpoint of the post hole as a reference, each tooth was cut longitudinally into two halves in a mesiodistal direction. On each half, the exposed root dentine was ground flat to the deepest point of the post space, and an even layer of cement was placed and light-cured. To obtain a clinically relevant layer of cement, the material thickness was reduced to 75 mu m by grinding with wet abrasive paper. A cement formulation with 30 wt% of filler was tested in one premolar, whilst a formulation with 70 wt% of filler was utilized in the contralateral tooth. Posts were then placed between the two facing root halves of each premolar, and radiopacity was measured in mmAl. Data were analysed using t-test for paired samples (P  lt  0.05). Results Radiopacity of posts ranged between 1.44 (ENA Post) and 5.78 mmAl (FibreKleer). In the presence of the more heavily filled cement, significantly higher values of post radiopacity were measured (P  lt  0.001). Conclusion The radiopacity of the luting agent contributed to the overall post radiovisibility within the root. Even when the cement with lower filler content was used in combination with the least radiodense dowels, the post was detectable within the root.
PB  - Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken
T2  - International Endodontic Journal
T1  - The influence of cement filler load on the radiopacity of various fibre posts ex vivo
VL  - 48
IS  - 1
SP  - 60
EP  - 67
DO  - 10.1111/iej.12275
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Goracci, Cecilia and Juloski, Jelena and Schiavetti, R. and Mainieri, P. and Giovannetti, Agostino and Vichi, Alessandro and Ferrari, Marco",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Aim To verify whether the filler load of luting agents influences the radiopacity of intraradicularly placed posts. Methodology Digital radiographs of the following posts were taken: RelyX Fiber Post (3M ESPE), GC Fiber Post (GC Corporation), DT Light Post Illusion (RTD), DT Light SL Post (RTD), Endo-Composipost (RTD), FibreKleer Parallel Post (Jeneric Pentron Incorporated), FRC Postec (Ivoclar Vivadent), Parapost Taper Lux (Coltene/Whaledent AG), Radix Fiber Post (Dentsply Maillefer), EverStick Post (Stick Tech Ltd), Dentin Post X (Komet), Tech 21 X-op (Isasan), ENA Post (Micerium). Post radiopacity was measured in millimetres of aluminium (mmAl) with reference to an aluminium step wedge. Two extracted contralateral premolars were root filled. After post space preparation, taking the midpoint of the post hole as a reference, each tooth was cut longitudinally into two halves in a mesiodistal direction. On each half, the exposed root dentine was ground flat to the deepest point of the post space, and an even layer of cement was placed and light-cured. To obtain a clinically relevant layer of cement, the material thickness was reduced to 75 mu m by grinding with wet abrasive paper. A cement formulation with 30 wt% of filler was tested in one premolar, whilst a formulation with 70 wt% of filler was utilized in the contralateral tooth. Posts were then placed between the two facing root halves of each premolar, and radiopacity was measured in mmAl. Data were analysed using t-test for paired samples (P  lt  0.05). Results Radiopacity of posts ranged between 1.44 (ENA Post) and 5.78 mmAl (FibreKleer). In the presence of the more heavily filled cement, significantly higher values of post radiopacity were measured (P  lt  0.001). Conclusion The radiopacity of the luting agent contributed to the overall post radiovisibility within the root. Even when the cement with lower filler content was used in combination with the least radiodense dowels, the post was detectable within the root.",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken",
journal = "International Endodontic Journal",
title = "The influence of cement filler load on the radiopacity of various fibre posts ex vivo",
volume = "48",
number = "1",
pages = "60-67",
doi = "10.1111/iej.12275"
}
Goracci, C., Juloski, J., Schiavetti, R., Mainieri, P., Giovannetti, A., Vichi, A.,& Ferrari, M.. (2015). The influence of cement filler load on the radiopacity of various fibre posts ex vivo. in International Endodontic Journal
Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken., 48(1), 60-67.
https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12275
Goracci C, Juloski J, Schiavetti R, Mainieri P, Giovannetti A, Vichi A, Ferrari M. The influence of cement filler load on the radiopacity of various fibre posts ex vivo. in International Endodontic Journal. 2015;48(1):60-67.
doi:10.1111/iej.12275 .
Goracci, Cecilia, Juloski, Jelena, Schiavetti, R., Mainieri, P., Giovannetti, Agostino, Vichi, Alessandro, Ferrari, Marco, "The influence of cement filler load on the radiopacity of various fibre posts ex vivo" in International Endodontic Journal, 48, no. 1 (2015):60-67,
https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12275 . .
9
8
11