TY  - JOUR
AU  - Miletić, Ivana
AU  - Baraba, Anja
AU  - Basso, Matteo
AU  - Pulcini, Maria Giulia
AU  - Marković, Dejan
AU  - Perić, Tamara
AU  - Ozkaya, Cigdem Atalayin
AU  - Turkun, Lezize Sebnem
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2476
AB  - Purpose: To compare the clinical performance of a glass hybrid restorative system, EQUIA Forte, with that of a nanohybrid resin composite, Tetric EvoCeram, in two-surface class II cavities. Materials and Methods: This multicenter, randomized controlled clinical study was conducted at four different dental schools. In total, 360 restorations were placed in patients in need of two class-II, two-surface restorations in the molar region of the same jaw. Each patient received one glass hybrid restoration (EQUIA Forte, GC) and one resin composite restoration (Tetric EvoCeram, Ivoclar Vivadent). Two independent evaluators performed a clinical evaluation of each site after 1 week (baseline), 1 year, and 2 years using the criteria of the FDI World Dental Federation (FDI-2). Results: The estimated survival rates at the 2-year recall were 93.6% and 94.5% for EQUIA Forte and Tetric EvoCeram, respectively. There were no significant differences in the survival rates or in any of the evaluated esthetic, functional or biological properties between EQUIA Forte and Tetric EvoCeram restorations (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Both the glass-hybrid restorative system and nanohybrid resin composite showed good clinical performance in moderate to large two-surface class II restorations in a 2-year follow-up.
PB  - Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, Hanover Park
T2  - Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
T1  - Clinical Performance of a Glass-Hybrid System Compared with a Resin Composite in the Posterior Region: Results of a 2-year Multicenter Study
VL  - 22
IS  - 3
SP  - 235
EP  - 247
DO  - 10.3290/j.jad.a44547
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Miletić, Ivana and Baraba, Anja and Basso, Matteo and Pulcini, Maria Giulia and Marković, Dejan and Perić, Tamara and Ozkaya, Cigdem Atalayin and Turkun, Lezize Sebnem",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare the clinical performance of a glass hybrid restorative system, EQUIA Forte, with that of a nanohybrid resin composite, Tetric EvoCeram, in two-surface class II cavities. Materials and Methods: This multicenter, randomized controlled clinical study was conducted at four different dental schools. In total, 360 restorations were placed in patients in need of two class-II, two-surface restorations in the molar region of the same jaw. Each patient received one glass hybrid restoration (EQUIA Forte, GC) and one resin composite restoration (Tetric EvoCeram, Ivoclar Vivadent). Two independent evaluators performed a clinical evaluation of each site after 1 week (baseline), 1 year, and 2 years using the criteria of the FDI World Dental Federation (FDI-2). Results: The estimated survival rates at the 2-year recall were 93.6% and 94.5% for EQUIA Forte and Tetric EvoCeram, respectively. There were no significant differences in the survival rates or in any of the evaluated esthetic, functional or biological properties between EQUIA Forte and Tetric EvoCeram restorations (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Both the glass-hybrid restorative system and nanohybrid resin composite showed good clinical performance in moderate to large two-surface class II restorations in a 2-year follow-up.",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, Hanover Park",
journal = "Journal of Adhesive Dentistry",
title = "Clinical Performance of a Glass-Hybrid System Compared with a Resin Composite in the Posterior Region: Results of a 2-year Multicenter Study",
volume = "22",
number = "3",
pages = "235-247",
doi = "10.3290/j.jad.a44547"
}

Miletić, I., Baraba, A., Basso, M., Pulcini, M. G., Marković, D., Perić, T., Ozkaya, C. A.,& Turkun, L. S.. (2020). Clinical Performance of a Glass-Hybrid System Compared with a Resin Composite in the Posterior Region: Results of a 2-year Multicenter Study. in Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, Hanover Park., 22(3), 235-247.
https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a44547

Miletić I, Baraba A, Basso M, Pulcini MG, Marković D, Perić T, Ozkaya CA, Turkun LS. Clinical Performance of a Glass-Hybrid System Compared with a Resin Composite in the Posterior Region: Results of a 2-year Multicenter Study. in Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2020;22(3):235-247.
doi:10.3290/j.jad.a44547 .

Miletić, Ivana, Baraba, Anja, Basso, Matteo, Pulcini, Maria Giulia, Marković, Dejan, Perić, Tamara, Ozkaya, Cigdem Atalayin, Turkun, Lezize Sebnem, "Clinical Performance of a Glass-Hybrid System Compared with a Resin Composite in the Posterior Region: Results of a 2-year Multicenter Study" in Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 22, no. 3 (2020):235-247,
https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a44547 . .