Milicević, Miroslav

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
4f2b5a20-f495-4f93-bbf5-f03100990601
  • Milicević, Miroslav (1)
Projects
No records found.

Author's Bibliography

Clamp-Crushing vs. Radiofrequency-Assisted Liver Resection: Changes in Liver Function Tests

Palibrk, Ivan; Miličić, Biljana; Stojiljković, Ljuba; Manojlović, Nebojša; Dugalić, Vladimir; Bumbaširević, Vesna; Kalezić, Nevena; Žuvela, Marinko; Milicević, Miroslav

(H G E Update Medical Publishing S A, Athens, 2012)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Palibrk, Ivan
AU  - Miličić, Biljana
AU  - Stojiljković, Ljuba
AU  - Manojlović, Nebojša
AU  - Dugalić, Vladimir
AU  - Bumbaširević, Vesna
AU  - Kalezić, Nevena
AU  - Žuvela, Marinko
AU  - Milicević, Miroslav
PY  - 2012
UR  - https://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1736
AB  - Background/Aims: Liver resection is the gold standard in managing patients with metastatic or primary liver cancer. The aim of our study was to compare the traditional clamp-crushing technique to the radiofrequency-assisted liver resection technique in terms of postoperative liver function. Methodology: Liver function was evaluated preoperatively and on postoperative days 3 and 7. Liver synthetic function parameters (serum albumin level, prothrombin time and international normalized ratio), markers of hepatic injury and necrosis (serum alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and total bilirubin level) and microsomal activity (quantitative lidocaine test) were compared. Results: Forty three patients completed the study (14 had clamp-crushing and 29 had radiofrequency assisted liver resection). The groups did not differ in demographic characteristics, pre-operative liver function, operative time and perioperative transfusion rate. In postoperative period, there were similar changes in monitored parameters in both groups except albumin levels, that were higher in radiofrequency-assisted liver resection group (p=0.047). Conclusions: Both, traditional clamp-crushing technique and radiofrequency assisted liver resection technique, result in similar postoperative changes of most monitored liver function parameters.
PB  - H G E Update Medical Publishing S A, Athens
T2  - Hepato-Gastroenterology
T1  - Clamp-Crushing vs. Radiofrequency-Assisted Liver Resection: Changes in Liver Function Tests
VL  - 59
IS  - 115
SP  - 800
EP  - 804
DO  - 10.5754/hge11539
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Palibrk, Ivan and Miličić, Biljana and Stojiljković, Ljuba and Manojlović, Nebojša and Dugalić, Vladimir and Bumbaširević, Vesna and Kalezić, Nevena and Žuvela, Marinko and Milicević, Miroslav",
year = "2012",
abstract = "Background/Aims: Liver resection is the gold standard in managing patients with metastatic or primary liver cancer. The aim of our study was to compare the traditional clamp-crushing technique to the radiofrequency-assisted liver resection technique in terms of postoperative liver function. Methodology: Liver function was evaluated preoperatively and on postoperative days 3 and 7. Liver synthetic function parameters (serum albumin level, prothrombin time and international normalized ratio), markers of hepatic injury and necrosis (serum alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and total bilirubin level) and microsomal activity (quantitative lidocaine test) were compared. Results: Forty three patients completed the study (14 had clamp-crushing and 29 had radiofrequency assisted liver resection). The groups did not differ in demographic characteristics, pre-operative liver function, operative time and perioperative transfusion rate. In postoperative period, there were similar changes in monitored parameters in both groups except albumin levels, that were higher in radiofrequency-assisted liver resection group (p=0.047). Conclusions: Both, traditional clamp-crushing technique and radiofrequency assisted liver resection technique, result in similar postoperative changes of most monitored liver function parameters.",
publisher = "H G E Update Medical Publishing S A, Athens",
journal = "Hepato-Gastroenterology",
title = "Clamp-Crushing vs. Radiofrequency-Assisted Liver Resection: Changes in Liver Function Tests",
volume = "59",
number = "115",
pages = "800-804",
doi = "10.5754/hge11539"
}
Palibrk, I., Miličić, B., Stojiljković, L., Manojlović, N., Dugalić, V., Bumbaširević, V., Kalezić, N., Žuvela, M.,& Milicević, M.. (2012). Clamp-Crushing vs. Radiofrequency-Assisted Liver Resection: Changes in Liver Function Tests. in Hepato-Gastroenterology
H G E Update Medical Publishing S A, Athens., 59(115), 800-804.
https://doi.org/10.5754/hge11539
Palibrk I, Miličić B, Stojiljković L, Manojlović N, Dugalić V, Bumbaširević V, Kalezić N, Žuvela M, Milicević M. Clamp-Crushing vs. Radiofrequency-Assisted Liver Resection: Changes in Liver Function Tests. in Hepato-Gastroenterology. 2012;59(115):800-804.
doi:10.5754/hge11539 .
Palibrk, Ivan, Miličić, Biljana, Stojiljković, Ljuba, Manojlović, Nebojša, Dugalić, Vladimir, Bumbaširević, Vesna, Kalezić, Nevena, Žuvela, Marinko, Milicević, Miroslav, "Clamp-Crushing vs. Radiofrequency-Assisted Liver Resection: Changes in Liver Function Tests" in Hepato-Gastroenterology, 59, no. 115 (2012):800-804,
https://doi.org/10.5754/hge11539 . .
3
3
3