TY  - JOUR
AU  - Goracci, Cecilia
AU  - Cadenaro, Milena
AU  - Fontanive, Luca
AU  - Giangrosso, Giuseppe
AU  - Juloski, Jelena
AU  - Vichi, Alessandro
AU  - Ferrari, Marco
PY  - 2014
UR  - https://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1899
AB  - Objectives.To assess depth of cure (DOC), degree of conversion (DC), and flexural strength( FS) of several resin composites with low-stress behavior. Methods. SonicFill (Kerr), SureFil((R)) SDRTM (Dentsply), everX Posterior (GC), Kalore (GC), and Filtek Silorane (3M ESPE) were tested. DOC was measured with the Acetone Shake test. DC was assessed with Fourier Transform Infra-Red spectroscopy on top and at the bottom of 4 mm-thick disk-shaped specimens. Bottom to top ratios of DC percentages were calculated. FS was evaluated with the Three-Point Bending test. DOC, DC, and FS data were statistically analyzed. Results. SureFil((R)) SDRTM and everX Posterior achieved significantly greater DOC than Kalore and Filtek Silorane. Also, SonicFill had significantly greater DOC than Filtek Silorane. Mean top DCs ranged between 71.46% and 52.44%. Kalore and everX Posterior had significantly lower top DCs than the other materials. Mean DC values at 4 mm ranged largely from 57.95% to 6.82%. Kalore and Filtek Silorane had the lowest values of bottom DC and the difference was statistically significant. EverX Posterior and SonicFill recorded significantly higher FSs than the other materials. Significance. SureFil((R)) SDRTM and everX Posterior exhibited DOC over 4 mm, the maximum thickness recommended for bulk placement, while SonicFill recorded DOC values very close to the 4 mm threshold. SonicFill achieved the highest DC at the irradiated surface, as well as at 4 mm depth. SureFil((R)) SDRTM demonstrated similarly uniform curing through the bulk increment. All the tested composites complied with the requirements of FS established by ISO 4049/2009.
PB  - Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford
T2  - Dental Materials
T1  - Polymerization efficiency and flexural strength of low-stress restorative composites
VL  - 30
IS  - 6
SP  - 688
EP  - 694
DO  - 10.1016/j.dental.2014.03.006
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Goracci, Cecilia and Cadenaro, Milena and Fontanive, Luca and Giangrosso, Giuseppe and Juloski, Jelena and Vichi, Alessandro and Ferrari, Marco",
year = "2014",
abstract = "Objectives.To assess depth of cure (DOC), degree of conversion (DC), and flexural strength( FS) of several resin composites with low-stress behavior. Methods. SonicFill (Kerr), SureFil((R)) SDRTM (Dentsply), everX Posterior (GC), Kalore (GC), and Filtek Silorane (3M ESPE) were tested. DOC was measured with the Acetone Shake test. DC was assessed with Fourier Transform Infra-Red spectroscopy on top and at the bottom of 4 mm-thick disk-shaped specimens. Bottom to top ratios of DC percentages were calculated. FS was evaluated with the Three-Point Bending test. DOC, DC, and FS data were statistically analyzed. Results. SureFil((R)) SDRTM and everX Posterior achieved significantly greater DOC than Kalore and Filtek Silorane. Also, SonicFill had significantly greater DOC than Filtek Silorane. Mean top DCs ranged between 71.46% and 52.44%. Kalore and everX Posterior had significantly lower top DCs than the other materials. Mean DC values at 4 mm ranged largely from 57.95% to 6.82%. Kalore and Filtek Silorane had the lowest values of bottom DC and the difference was statistically significant. EverX Posterior and SonicFill recorded significantly higher FSs than the other materials. Significance. SureFil((R)) SDRTM and everX Posterior exhibited DOC over 4 mm, the maximum thickness recommended for bulk placement, while SonicFill recorded DOC values very close to the 4 mm threshold. SonicFill achieved the highest DC at the irradiated surface, as well as at 4 mm depth. SureFil((R)) SDRTM demonstrated similarly uniform curing through the bulk increment. All the tested composites complied with the requirements of FS established by ISO 4049/2009.",
publisher = "Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford",
journal = "Dental Materials",
title = "Polymerization efficiency and flexural strength of low-stress restorative composites",
volume = "30",
number = "6",
pages = "688-694",
doi = "10.1016/j.dental.2014.03.006"
}

Goracci, C., Cadenaro, M., Fontanive, L., Giangrosso, G., Juloski, J., Vichi, A.,& Ferrari, M.. (2014). Polymerization efficiency and flexural strength of low-stress restorative composites. in Dental Materials
Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford., 30(6), 688-694.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.03.006

Goracci C, Cadenaro M, Fontanive L, Giangrosso G, Juloski J, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Polymerization efficiency and flexural strength of low-stress restorative composites. in Dental Materials. 2014;30(6):688-694.
doi:10.1016/j.dental.2014.03.006 .

Goracci, Cecilia, Cadenaro, Milena, Fontanive, Luca, Giangrosso, Giuseppe, Juloski, Jelena, Vichi, Alessandro, Ferrari, Marco, "Polymerization efficiency and flexural strength of low-stress restorative composites" in Dental Materials, 30, no. 6 (2014):688-694,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.03.006 . .