Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts cemented using different adhesive approaches
Само за регистроване кориснике
2008
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)

Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
The aim of this study was to investigate the adhesion of fiber posts cemented with luting agents that utilize three currently available adhesive approaches: etch-and-rinse, self-etch, and self-adhesive. Forty-two intact single-rooted human premolars were used in the study. Teeth were divided into six groups. In each group, a different resin cement with its adhesive system (if needed) and a fiber post were used. The groups were classified, according to the adhesive approach, into the following three categories. (i) Etch-and-rinse groups: Calibra resin cement/XPBond adhesive + self-curing activator (SCA)/RadiX Fiber Post (Dentsply Caulk), FluoroCore 2 core build-up material/XPBond + SCA/RadiX Fiber Post (Dentsply Caulk), and MultiCore Flow luting and core build-up material/Excite DSC adhesive/FRC Postec Plus fiber post (Ivoclar Vivadent). (ii) Self-etch group: Panavia F 2.0/ED primer (Kuraray)/RadiX Fiber Post (Dentsply Caulk). (iii) Self-adhesive groups: experimental self-adhesive cemen...t/RadiX Fiber Post (Dentsply Caulk), and RelyX Unicem/RelyX Fiber Post (3M ESPE). The adhesion between the post and the root canal walls was assessed using the 'thin-slice' push-out test. In the test arrangement used, the self-etching approach may offer less favourable adhesion to root canal dentin in comparison with etch-and-rinse and self-adhesive approaches.
Кључне речи:
dentin-bonding agents / post-and-core technique / resin cementsИзвор:
European Journal of Oral Sciences, 2008, 116, 6, 557-563Издавач:
- Wiley-Blackwell, Malden
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00577.x
ISSN: 0909-8836
PubMed: 19049527
WoS: 000261122300010
Scopus: 2-s2.0-56749097048
Колекције
Институција/група
Stomatološki fakultetTY - JOUR AU - Radović, Ivana AU - Mazzitelli, Claudia AU - Chieffi, Nicoletta AU - Ferrari, Marco PY - 2008 UR - https://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1383 AB - The aim of this study was to investigate the adhesion of fiber posts cemented with luting agents that utilize three currently available adhesive approaches: etch-and-rinse, self-etch, and self-adhesive. Forty-two intact single-rooted human premolars were used in the study. Teeth were divided into six groups. In each group, a different resin cement with its adhesive system (if needed) and a fiber post were used. The groups were classified, according to the adhesive approach, into the following three categories. (i) Etch-and-rinse groups: Calibra resin cement/XPBond adhesive + self-curing activator (SCA)/RadiX Fiber Post (Dentsply Caulk), FluoroCore 2 core build-up material/XPBond + SCA/RadiX Fiber Post (Dentsply Caulk), and MultiCore Flow luting and core build-up material/Excite DSC adhesive/FRC Postec Plus fiber post (Ivoclar Vivadent). (ii) Self-etch group: Panavia F 2.0/ED primer (Kuraray)/RadiX Fiber Post (Dentsply Caulk). (iii) Self-adhesive groups: experimental self-adhesive cement/RadiX Fiber Post (Dentsply Caulk), and RelyX Unicem/RelyX Fiber Post (3M ESPE). The adhesion between the post and the root canal walls was assessed using the 'thin-slice' push-out test. In the test arrangement used, the self-etching approach may offer less favourable adhesion to root canal dentin in comparison with etch-and-rinse and self-adhesive approaches. PB - Wiley-Blackwell, Malden T2 - European Journal of Oral Sciences T1 - Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts cemented using different adhesive approaches VL - 116 IS - 6 SP - 557 EP - 563 DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00577.x ER -
@article{ author = "Radović, Ivana and Mazzitelli, Claudia and Chieffi, Nicoletta and Ferrari, Marco", year = "2008", abstract = "The aim of this study was to investigate the adhesion of fiber posts cemented with luting agents that utilize three currently available adhesive approaches: etch-and-rinse, self-etch, and self-adhesive. Forty-two intact single-rooted human premolars were used in the study. Teeth were divided into six groups. In each group, a different resin cement with its adhesive system (if needed) and a fiber post were used. The groups were classified, according to the adhesive approach, into the following three categories. (i) Etch-and-rinse groups: Calibra resin cement/XPBond adhesive + self-curing activator (SCA)/RadiX Fiber Post (Dentsply Caulk), FluoroCore 2 core build-up material/XPBond + SCA/RadiX Fiber Post (Dentsply Caulk), and MultiCore Flow luting and core build-up material/Excite DSC adhesive/FRC Postec Plus fiber post (Ivoclar Vivadent). (ii) Self-etch group: Panavia F 2.0/ED primer (Kuraray)/RadiX Fiber Post (Dentsply Caulk). (iii) Self-adhesive groups: experimental self-adhesive cement/RadiX Fiber Post (Dentsply Caulk), and RelyX Unicem/RelyX Fiber Post (3M ESPE). The adhesion between the post and the root canal walls was assessed using the 'thin-slice' push-out test. In the test arrangement used, the self-etching approach may offer less favourable adhesion to root canal dentin in comparison with etch-and-rinse and self-adhesive approaches.", publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell, Malden", journal = "European Journal of Oral Sciences", title = "Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts cemented using different adhesive approaches", volume = "116", number = "6", pages = "557-563", doi = "10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00577.x" }
Radović, I., Mazzitelli, C., Chieffi, N.,& Ferrari, M.. (2008). Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts cemented using different adhesive approaches. in European Journal of Oral Sciences Wiley-Blackwell, Malden., 116(6), 557-563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00577.x
Radović I, Mazzitelli C, Chieffi N, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts cemented using different adhesive approaches. in European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2008;116(6):557-563. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00577.x .
Radović, Ivana, Mazzitelli, Claudia, Chieffi, Nicoletta, Ferrari, Marco, "Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts cemented using different adhesive approaches" in European Journal of Oral Sciences, 116, no. 6 (2008):557-563, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00577.x . .