SMILE – Repository of the Faculty of Dental Medicine
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Dental Medicine
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   SMILE
  • Stomatološki fakultet
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
  •   SMILE
  • Stomatološki fakultet
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Intraseptal vs. periodontal ligament anaesthesia for maxillary tooth extraction: quality of local anaesthesia and haemodynamic response

Authorized Users Only
2010
Authors
Brković, Božidar
Savić, Miroslav
Andrić, Miroslav
Jurišić, Milan
Todorović, Ljubomir
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
There is no data concerning the use of the intraseptal anaesthesia (ISA) for single tooth extraction. The aims of this study were to compare the clinical efficacy and haemodynamic responses of the ISA with the periodontal ligament anaesthesia (PLA) for single tooth extraction. Thirty-five randomly selected healthy patients (ASA I) undergoing maxillary lateral incisors extraction entered the study. Onset of anaesthesia, the width of the anaesthetic field and duration of anaesthesia were recorded by pinprick testing. Intensity of anaesthesia was evaluated on a visual analogue scale. Haemodynamic parameters were recorded simultaneously at different time points after anaesthesia injection. The two techniques of local anaesthesia did not show statistically significant differences regarding the success rate and onset of anaesthesia, while the duration of the ISA on the buccal site was significantly longer in comparison with the PLA. The intensity of the achieved anaesthesia, estimated by the... experienced pain during procedure, pointed out that pain was recorded in 24% of cases in the ISA group, and in 19% in the PLA group without significant differences. Postoperative pain was found to be smaller in the ISA group (70.9% of treated sites) than in the PLA group (81.3% of treated sites); however, this difference was not significant. Although the heart rate increased in both groups, there were no significant differences in the patients' haemodynamic response between the ISA and the PLA. The results of the present study indicate that both techniques are useful and suitable for the routine tooth extraction.

Keywords:
Intraseptal local anaesthesia / Periodontal ligament anaesthesia / Tooth extraction / Anaesthetic parameters / Haemodynamic parameters
Source:
Clinical Oral Investigations, 2010, 14, 6, 675-681
Publisher:
  • Springer Heidelberg, Heidelberg
Funding / projects:
  • Biološke osnove oralnohirurških terapijskih postupaka (RS-156039)

DOI: 10.1007/s00784-009-0352-7

ISSN: 1432-6981

PubMed: 19902278

WoS: 000284155700008

Scopus: 2-s2.0-78449255792
[ Google Scholar ]
13
10
URI
https://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1565
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača
Institution/Community
Stomatološki fakultet
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Brković, Božidar
AU  - Savić, Miroslav
AU  - Andrić, Miroslav
AU  - Jurišić, Milan
AU  - Todorović, Ljubomir
PY  - 2010
UR  - https://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1565
AB  - There is no data concerning the use of the intraseptal anaesthesia (ISA) for single tooth extraction. The aims of this study were to compare the clinical efficacy and haemodynamic responses of the ISA with the periodontal ligament anaesthesia (PLA) for single tooth extraction. Thirty-five randomly selected healthy patients (ASA I) undergoing maxillary lateral incisors extraction entered the study. Onset of anaesthesia, the width of the anaesthetic field and duration of anaesthesia were recorded by pinprick testing. Intensity of anaesthesia was evaluated on a visual analogue scale. Haemodynamic parameters were recorded simultaneously at different time points after anaesthesia injection. The two techniques of local anaesthesia did not show statistically significant differences regarding the success rate and onset of anaesthesia, while the duration of the ISA on the buccal site was significantly longer in comparison with the PLA. The intensity of the achieved anaesthesia, estimated by the experienced pain during procedure, pointed out that pain was recorded in 24% of cases in the ISA group, and in 19% in the PLA group without significant differences. Postoperative pain was found to be smaller in the ISA group (70.9% of treated sites) than in the PLA group (81.3% of treated sites); however, this difference was not significant. Although the heart rate increased in both groups, there were no significant differences in the patients' haemodynamic response between the ISA and the PLA. The results of the present study indicate that both techniques are useful and suitable for the routine tooth extraction.
PB  - Springer Heidelberg, Heidelberg
T2  - Clinical Oral Investigations
T1  - Intraseptal vs. periodontal ligament anaesthesia for maxillary tooth extraction: quality of local anaesthesia and haemodynamic response
VL  - 14
IS  - 6
SP  - 675
EP  - 681
DO  - 10.1007/s00784-009-0352-7
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Brković, Božidar and Savić, Miroslav and Andrić, Miroslav and Jurišić, Milan and Todorović, Ljubomir",
year = "2010",
abstract = "There is no data concerning the use of the intraseptal anaesthesia (ISA) for single tooth extraction. The aims of this study were to compare the clinical efficacy and haemodynamic responses of the ISA with the periodontal ligament anaesthesia (PLA) for single tooth extraction. Thirty-five randomly selected healthy patients (ASA I) undergoing maxillary lateral incisors extraction entered the study. Onset of anaesthesia, the width of the anaesthetic field and duration of anaesthesia were recorded by pinprick testing. Intensity of anaesthesia was evaluated on a visual analogue scale. Haemodynamic parameters were recorded simultaneously at different time points after anaesthesia injection. The two techniques of local anaesthesia did not show statistically significant differences regarding the success rate and onset of anaesthesia, while the duration of the ISA on the buccal site was significantly longer in comparison with the PLA. The intensity of the achieved anaesthesia, estimated by the experienced pain during procedure, pointed out that pain was recorded in 24% of cases in the ISA group, and in 19% in the PLA group without significant differences. Postoperative pain was found to be smaller in the ISA group (70.9% of treated sites) than in the PLA group (81.3% of treated sites); however, this difference was not significant. Although the heart rate increased in both groups, there were no significant differences in the patients' haemodynamic response between the ISA and the PLA. The results of the present study indicate that both techniques are useful and suitable for the routine tooth extraction.",
publisher = "Springer Heidelberg, Heidelberg",
journal = "Clinical Oral Investigations",
title = "Intraseptal vs. periodontal ligament anaesthesia for maxillary tooth extraction: quality of local anaesthesia and haemodynamic response",
volume = "14",
number = "6",
pages = "675-681",
doi = "10.1007/s00784-009-0352-7"
}
Brković, B., Savić, M., Andrić, M., Jurišić, M.,& Todorović, L.. (2010). Intraseptal vs. periodontal ligament anaesthesia for maxillary tooth extraction: quality of local anaesthesia and haemodynamic response. in Clinical Oral Investigations
Springer Heidelberg, Heidelberg., 14(6), 675-681.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0352-7
Brković B, Savić M, Andrić M, Jurišić M, Todorović L. Intraseptal vs. periodontal ligament anaesthesia for maxillary tooth extraction: quality of local anaesthesia and haemodynamic response. in Clinical Oral Investigations. 2010;14(6):675-681.
doi:10.1007/s00784-009-0352-7 .
Brković, Božidar, Savić, Miroslav, Andrić, Miroslav, Jurišić, Milan, Todorović, Ljubomir, "Intraseptal vs. periodontal ligament anaesthesia for maxillary tooth extraction: quality of local anaesthesia and haemodynamic response" in Clinical Oral Investigations, 14, no. 6 (2010):675-681,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0352-7 . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About Smile – School of dental Medicine dIgitaL archivE | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About Smile – School of dental Medicine dIgitaL archivE | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB