SMILE – Repository of the Faculty of Dental Medicine
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Dental Medicine
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   SMILE
  • Stomatološki fakultet
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
  •   SMILE
  • Stomatološki fakultet
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Micro-Raman Assessment of the Ratio of Carbon-Carbon Double Bonds of Two Adhesive Systems Cured with LED or Halogen Light-curing Units

No Thumbnail
Authors
Miletić, Vesna
Santini, Ario
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of the study was to compare the ratio of carbon carbon double bonds (RDB) of two adhesive systems cured by five different light curing units (LCUs) using micro Raman spectroscopy Materials and Methods Ten samples of an etch and rinse (Excite) a two-step self etching adhesive system (AdheSE) - ie primer and bond mixed - and AdheSE Bond only were prepared and cured with one of the following LEDs Elipar Freelight2 Bluephase Smart Lite, Coltolux, each for 10 s, or a conventional halogen Prismetics Lite for 10 s or 20 s Micro-Raman spectra were obtained from uncured and cured samples of all three groups to calculate the RDB Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA Results The mean RDB values were 62% to 76% (Excite), 36% to 50% (AdheSE Primer+Bond) and 58% to 63% (Ad heSE Bond) At 20 s, Prismetics Lite produced significantly higher RDB in Excite than the other LCUs and Prismetics Lite at 10 s (p lt 0 05) Prismetics Lite at 20 s and Elipar produced comparable RDB va...lues of AdheSE Bond and Ad heSE Primer+Bond (p > 0 05) Excite showed significantly higher RDB values than AdheSE (p lt 0 05) whilst AdheSE Bond showed significantly higher RDB than AdheSE Primer+Bond (p lt 0 05) Conclusion The etch and rinse adhesive cured with the halogen LCU for 20 s gave higher conversion than LED LCUs or halogen for 10 s curing time The highest intensity LED [Elipar] produced higher or comparable conversion compared to the lower intensity LED LCUs for the same curing time The etch and rinse adhesive showed higher RDB than the self etching adhesive system The presence of the primer in the self etching adhesive compromised polymerisaton

Keywords:
micro Raman spectroscopy / adhesive systems / degree of conversion / light curing units
Source:
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 2010, 12, 6, 461-467
Publisher:
  • Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, Hanover Park

DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a17855

ISSN: 1461-5185

PubMed: 20157649

WoS: 000285440700006

Scopus: 2-s2.0-79953002302
[ Google Scholar ]
5
5
URI
https://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1578
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača
Institution/Community
Stomatološki fakultet
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Miletić, Vesna
AU  - Santini, Ario
PY  - 2010
UR  - https://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1578
AB  - Purpose The purpose of the study was to compare the ratio of carbon carbon double bonds (RDB) of two adhesive systems cured by five different light curing units (LCUs) using micro Raman spectroscopy Materials and Methods Ten samples of an etch and rinse (Excite) a two-step self etching adhesive system (AdheSE) - ie primer and bond mixed - and AdheSE Bond only were prepared and cured with one of the following LEDs Elipar Freelight2 Bluephase Smart Lite, Coltolux, each for 10 s, or a conventional halogen Prismetics Lite for 10 s or 20 s Micro-Raman spectra were obtained from uncured and cured samples of all three groups to calculate the RDB Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA Results The mean RDB values were 62% to 76% (Excite), 36% to 50% (AdheSE Primer+Bond) and 58% to 63% (Ad heSE Bond) At 20 s, Prismetics Lite produced significantly higher RDB in Excite than the other LCUs and Prismetics Lite at 10 s (p  lt  0 05) Prismetics Lite at 20 s and Elipar produced comparable RDB values of AdheSE Bond and Ad heSE Primer+Bond (p > 0 05) Excite showed significantly higher RDB values than AdheSE (p  lt  0 05) whilst AdheSE Bond showed significantly higher RDB than AdheSE Primer+Bond (p  lt  0 05) Conclusion The etch and rinse adhesive cured with the halogen LCU for 20 s gave higher conversion than LED LCUs or halogen for 10 s curing time The highest intensity LED [Elipar] produced higher or comparable conversion compared to the lower intensity LED LCUs for the same curing time The etch and rinse adhesive showed higher RDB than the self etching adhesive system The presence of the primer in the self etching adhesive compromised polymerisaton
PB  - Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, Hanover Park
T2  - Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
T1  - Micro-Raman Assessment of the Ratio of Carbon-Carbon Double Bonds of Two Adhesive Systems Cured with LED or Halogen Light-curing Units
VL  - 12
IS  - 6
SP  - 461
EP  - 467
DO  - 10.3290/j.jad.a17855
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Miletić, Vesna and Santini, Ario",
year = "2010",
abstract = "Purpose The purpose of the study was to compare the ratio of carbon carbon double bonds (RDB) of two adhesive systems cured by five different light curing units (LCUs) using micro Raman spectroscopy Materials and Methods Ten samples of an etch and rinse (Excite) a two-step self etching adhesive system (AdheSE) - ie primer and bond mixed - and AdheSE Bond only were prepared and cured with one of the following LEDs Elipar Freelight2 Bluephase Smart Lite, Coltolux, each for 10 s, or a conventional halogen Prismetics Lite for 10 s or 20 s Micro-Raman spectra were obtained from uncured and cured samples of all three groups to calculate the RDB Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA Results The mean RDB values were 62% to 76% (Excite), 36% to 50% (AdheSE Primer+Bond) and 58% to 63% (Ad heSE Bond) At 20 s, Prismetics Lite produced significantly higher RDB in Excite than the other LCUs and Prismetics Lite at 10 s (p  lt  0 05) Prismetics Lite at 20 s and Elipar produced comparable RDB values of AdheSE Bond and Ad heSE Primer+Bond (p > 0 05) Excite showed significantly higher RDB values than AdheSE (p  lt  0 05) whilst AdheSE Bond showed significantly higher RDB than AdheSE Primer+Bond (p  lt  0 05) Conclusion The etch and rinse adhesive cured with the halogen LCU for 20 s gave higher conversion than LED LCUs or halogen for 10 s curing time The highest intensity LED [Elipar] produced higher or comparable conversion compared to the lower intensity LED LCUs for the same curing time The etch and rinse adhesive showed higher RDB than the self etching adhesive system The presence of the primer in the self etching adhesive compromised polymerisaton",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, Hanover Park",
journal = "Journal of Adhesive Dentistry",
title = "Micro-Raman Assessment of the Ratio of Carbon-Carbon Double Bonds of Two Adhesive Systems Cured with LED or Halogen Light-curing Units",
volume = "12",
number = "6",
pages = "461-467",
doi = "10.3290/j.jad.a17855"
}
Miletić, V.,& Santini, A.. (2010). Micro-Raman Assessment of the Ratio of Carbon-Carbon Double Bonds of Two Adhesive Systems Cured with LED or Halogen Light-curing Units. in Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, Hanover Park., 12(6), 461-467.
https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a17855
Miletić V, Santini A. Micro-Raman Assessment of the Ratio of Carbon-Carbon Double Bonds of Two Adhesive Systems Cured with LED or Halogen Light-curing Units. in Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2010;12(6):461-467.
doi:10.3290/j.jad.a17855 .
Miletić, Vesna, Santini, Ario, "Micro-Raman Assessment of the Ratio of Carbon-Carbon Double Bonds of Two Adhesive Systems Cured with LED or Halogen Light-curing Units" in Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 12, no. 6 (2010):461-467,
https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a17855 . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About Smile – School of dental Medicine dIgitaL archivE | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About Smile – School of dental Medicine dIgitaL archivE | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB