Objective. The aim of this clinical trial was to compare primary and secondary stability of implants placed by bone condensing versus the standard drilling technique in the posterior edentulous maxilla. Study design. Forty-eight SLA Straumann implants 4.1 x 10 mm (Institut Straumann AG, Waldenburg, Switzerland) were placed into edentulous maxillary posterior region in the same positions bilaterally, using the bone condensation technique for one and the standard technique for the other side. Implant stability measurements were performed immediately after implant placement, as well as every week for the next 6 weeks by use of resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon tests. Results. After bone condensing, significantly higher implant stability was recorded immediately after surgery as well as during the whole observation period of 6 weeks compared with bone-drilling technique (Mann-Whitney U test, P lt .000). Conclusions. The bone-condensi...ng technique can be recommended as an alternate surgical approach for implant site preparation in reduced bone density to achieve greater implant stability in the posterior maxilla. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 112: 557-563)
TY - JOUR
AU - Marković, Aleksa
AU - Ćalasan, Dejan
AU - Čolić, Snježana
AU - Stojčev-Stajčić, Ljiljana
AU - Janjić, Bojan
AU - Mišić, Tijana
PY - 2011
UR - https://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1612
AB - Objective. The aim of this clinical trial was to compare primary and secondary stability of implants placed by bone condensing versus the standard drilling technique in the posterior edentulous maxilla. Study design. Forty-eight SLA Straumann implants 4.1 x 10 mm (Institut Straumann AG, Waldenburg, Switzerland) were placed into edentulous maxillary posterior region in the same positions bilaterally, using the bone condensation technique for one and the standard technique for the other side. Implant stability measurements were performed immediately after implant placement, as well as every week for the next 6 weeks by use of resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon tests. Results. After bone condensing, significantly higher implant stability was recorded immediately after surgery as well as during the whole observation period of 6 weeks compared with bone-drilling technique (Mann-Whitney U test, P lt .000). Conclusions. The bone-condensing technique can be recommended as an alternate surgical approach for implant site preparation in reduced bone density to achieve greater implant stability in the posterior maxilla. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 112: 557-563)
PB - Mosby-Elsevier, New York
T2 - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology & Endodontology
T1 - Implant stability in posterior maxilla: bone-condensing versus bone-drilling: a clinical study
VL - 112
IS - 5
SP - 557
EP - 563
DO - 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.11.010
ER -
@article{
author = "Marković, Aleksa and Ćalasan, Dejan and Čolić, Snježana and Stojčev-Stajčić, Ljiljana and Janjić, Bojan and Mišić, Tijana",
year = "2011",
abstract = "Objective. The aim of this clinical trial was to compare primary and secondary stability of implants placed by bone condensing versus the standard drilling technique in the posterior edentulous maxilla. Study design. Forty-eight SLA Straumann implants 4.1 x 10 mm (Institut Straumann AG, Waldenburg, Switzerland) were placed into edentulous maxillary posterior region in the same positions bilaterally, using the bone condensation technique for one and the standard technique for the other side. Implant stability measurements were performed immediately after implant placement, as well as every week for the next 6 weeks by use of resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon tests. Results. After bone condensing, significantly higher implant stability was recorded immediately after surgery as well as during the whole observation period of 6 weeks compared with bone-drilling technique (Mann-Whitney U test, P lt .000). Conclusions. The bone-condensing technique can be recommended as an alternate surgical approach for implant site preparation in reduced bone density to achieve greater implant stability in the posterior maxilla. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 112: 557-563)",
publisher = "Mosby-Elsevier, New York",
journal = "Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology & Endodontology",
title = "Implant stability in posterior maxilla: bone-condensing versus bone-drilling: a clinical study",
volume = "112",
number = "5",
pages = "557-563",
doi = "10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.11.010"
}
Marković, A., Ćalasan, D., Čolić, S., Stojčev-Stajčić, L., Janjić, B.,& Mišić, T.. (2011). Implant stability in posterior maxilla: bone-condensing versus bone-drilling: a clinical study. in Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology & Endodontology
Mosby-Elsevier, New York., 112(5), 557-563.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.11.010
Marković A, Ćalasan D, Čolić S, Stojčev-Stajčić L, Janjić B, Mišić T. Implant stability in posterior maxilla: bone-condensing versus bone-drilling: a clinical study. in Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology & Endodontology. 2011;112(5):557-563.
doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.11.010 .
