SMILE – Repository of the Faculty of Dental Medicine
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Dental Medicine
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   SMILE
  • Stomatološki fakultet
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
  •   SMILE
  • Stomatološki fakultet
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Microleakage of Class II restorations and microtensile bond strength to dentin of low-shrinkage composites

No Thumbnail
Authors
Juloski, Jelena
Carrabba, Michele
Manuel Aragoneses, Juan
Forner, Leopoldo
Vichi, Alessandro
Ferrari, Marco
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the microleakage of Class II cavities restored with experimental low-shrinking resin composites proposed for bulk filling and to measure their microtensile bond strength (mu TBS) to dentin and compare to those of previously marketed low-shrinkage composites. Methods: Class II cavities (7 mm occluso-gingival height, 2 mm mesio-distal depth of the box, 4 mm occlusal depth, 4 mm bucco-lingual width) were prepared in 50 molars and randomly divided into five groups (n=10), according to the material: SureFil SDR flow (SDR), Filtek Silorane (FS) and experimental materials (G-aenial Flo bulk fill, GF; G-aenial Universal Flo bulk fill, GUF; GC Kalore bulk fill, GK). Microleakage was separately assessed at enamel and dentin margins by scoring the depth of silver-nitrate penetration. Twenty teeth divided into five groups (n= 4) were selected for mu TBS testing. The same materials as for microleakage assessment were placed in bulk to mid-coronal dentin. Microtensile beams were... loaded in tension, and mu TBS at failure was calculated in MPa. Microleakage and mu TBS data were analyzed by ANOVA on ranks, followed Dunn's post hoc test (P lt 0.05). Results: Microleakage was not observed at the enamel interface in any of the groups. At the dentin interface, SDR recorded significantly higher microleakage than the other materials. mu TBS of GF, GUF and GK did not differ among each other (33 +/- 12 MPa, 31 +/- 11 MPa, 30 +/- 9 MPa, respectively), while SDR (63 +/- 17 MPa) and FS (55 +/- 17MPa) achieved significantly higher mu TBS values. No direct association between the sealing properties and the bond strength values was observed.

Source:
American Journal of Dentistry, 2013, 26, 5, 271-277

ISSN: 0894-8275

WoS: 000326905700007

Scopus: 2-s2.0-84889874175
[ Google Scholar ]
21
16
Handle
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_smile_1820
URI
https://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1820
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača
Institution/Community
Stomatološki fakultet
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Juloski, Jelena
AU  - Carrabba, Michele
AU  - Manuel Aragoneses, Juan
AU  - Forner, Leopoldo
AU  - Vichi, Alessandro
AU  - Ferrari, Marco
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1820
AB  - Purpose: To evaluate the microleakage of Class II cavities restored with experimental low-shrinking resin composites proposed for bulk filling and to measure their microtensile bond strength (mu TBS) to dentin and compare to those of previously marketed low-shrinkage composites. Methods: Class II cavities (7 mm occluso-gingival height, 2 mm mesio-distal depth of the box, 4 mm occlusal depth, 4 mm bucco-lingual width) were prepared in 50 molars and randomly divided into five groups (n=10), according to the material: SureFil SDR flow (SDR), Filtek Silorane (FS) and experimental materials (G-aenial Flo bulk fill, GF; G-aenial Universal Flo bulk fill, GUF; GC Kalore bulk fill, GK). Microleakage was separately assessed at enamel and dentin margins by scoring the depth of silver-nitrate penetration. Twenty teeth divided into five groups (n= 4) were selected for mu TBS testing. The same materials as for microleakage assessment were placed in bulk to mid-coronal dentin. Microtensile beams were loaded in tension, and mu TBS at failure was calculated in MPa. Microleakage and mu TBS data were analyzed by ANOVA on ranks, followed Dunn's post hoc test (P lt  0.05). Results: Microleakage was not observed at the enamel interface in any of the groups. At the dentin interface, SDR recorded significantly higher microleakage than the other materials. mu TBS of GF, GUF and GK did not differ among each other (33 +/- 12 MPa, 31 +/- 11 MPa, 30 +/- 9 MPa, respectively), while SDR (63 +/- 17 MPa) and FS (55 +/- 17MPa) achieved significantly higher mu TBS values. No direct association between the sealing properties and the bond strength values was observed.
T2  - American Journal of Dentistry
T1  - Microleakage of Class II restorations and microtensile bond strength to dentin of low-shrinkage composites
VL  - 26
IS  - 5
SP  - 271
EP  - 277
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_smile_1820
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Juloski, Jelena and Carrabba, Michele and Manuel Aragoneses, Juan and Forner, Leopoldo and Vichi, Alessandro and Ferrari, Marco",
year = "2013",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the microleakage of Class II cavities restored with experimental low-shrinking resin composites proposed for bulk filling and to measure their microtensile bond strength (mu TBS) to dentin and compare to those of previously marketed low-shrinkage composites. Methods: Class II cavities (7 mm occluso-gingival height, 2 mm mesio-distal depth of the box, 4 mm occlusal depth, 4 mm bucco-lingual width) were prepared in 50 molars and randomly divided into five groups (n=10), according to the material: SureFil SDR flow (SDR), Filtek Silorane (FS) and experimental materials (G-aenial Flo bulk fill, GF; G-aenial Universal Flo bulk fill, GUF; GC Kalore bulk fill, GK). Microleakage was separately assessed at enamel and dentin margins by scoring the depth of silver-nitrate penetration. Twenty teeth divided into five groups (n= 4) were selected for mu TBS testing. The same materials as for microleakage assessment were placed in bulk to mid-coronal dentin. Microtensile beams were loaded in tension, and mu TBS at failure was calculated in MPa. Microleakage and mu TBS data were analyzed by ANOVA on ranks, followed Dunn's post hoc test (P lt  0.05). Results: Microleakage was not observed at the enamel interface in any of the groups. At the dentin interface, SDR recorded significantly higher microleakage than the other materials. mu TBS of GF, GUF and GK did not differ among each other (33 +/- 12 MPa, 31 +/- 11 MPa, 30 +/- 9 MPa, respectively), while SDR (63 +/- 17 MPa) and FS (55 +/- 17MPa) achieved significantly higher mu TBS values. No direct association between the sealing properties and the bond strength values was observed.",
journal = "American Journal of Dentistry",
title = "Microleakage of Class II restorations and microtensile bond strength to dentin of low-shrinkage composites",
volume = "26",
number = "5",
pages = "271-277",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_smile_1820"
}
Juloski, J., Carrabba, M., Manuel Aragoneses, J., Forner, L., Vichi, A.,& Ferrari, M.. (2013). Microleakage of Class II restorations and microtensile bond strength to dentin of low-shrinkage composites. in American Journal of Dentistry, 26(5), 271-277.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_smile_1820
Juloski J, Carrabba M, Manuel Aragoneses J, Forner L, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Microleakage of Class II restorations and microtensile bond strength to dentin of low-shrinkage composites. in American Journal of Dentistry. 2013;26(5):271-277.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_smile_1820 .
Juloski, Jelena, Carrabba, Michele, Manuel Aragoneses, Juan, Forner, Leopoldo, Vichi, Alessandro, Ferrari, Marco, "Microleakage of Class II restorations and microtensile bond strength to dentin of low-shrinkage composites" in American Journal of Dentistry, 26, no. 5 (2013):271-277,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_smile_1820 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About Smile – School of dental Medicine dIgitaL archivE | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About Smile – School of dental Medicine dIgitaL archivE | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB