Real-time thermographic analysis of low-density bone during implant placement: a randomized parallel-group clinical study comparing lateral condensation with bone drilling surgical technique
Authorized Users Only
2014
Authors
Marković, Aleksa
Mišić, Tijana
Mancić, Dragan
Jovanović, Igor

Šćepanović, Miodrag
Jezdić, Zoran
Article (Published version)

Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Objectives: To compare the effect of two surgical techniques, lateral condensation and bone drilling, on changes in temperature of the adjacent low-density bone during implant placement into posterior maxilla and to investigate the influence of the host factors - age, gender, region of implantation, bone density, and thickness of the cortical bone at the recipient sites. Material and methods: Local bone temperature was measured thermographically during implant placement into posterior maxilla following lateral bone condensing (test group) or bone drilling (controls). The main study outcomes were baseline bone temperature prior to implantation and maximum bone temperature recorded during implantation. Early implant success was evaluated after 6 months of healing. Results: A total of 40 implants were randomly allocated to test and control groups and placed into maxillary premolar and/or molar region of 18 participants of both genders and average age of 51.74 years. All recorded bone temp...eratures were below the threshold for thermal necrosis. Although both groups showed significant increase in bone temperature during implant placement procedure (P lt = 0.0005), it was significantly higher for bone condensing compared with drilling (P lt = 0.0005; 3.79 +/- 1.54 degrees C; 1.91 +/- 0.70 degrees C respectively). No host factor was singled out as a significant predictor of bone temperature changes, although trend of higher increase was observed in young patients, regardless of gender, during implant placement procedure into maxillary first premolar region with bone density type 3 and cortical layer thicker than 1 mm. Early implant success rate after 6 months follow-up was 100%. Conclusion: Although both surgical techniques, bone condensing and bone drilling, can be considered safe regarding their thermal effect on the bone of posterior maxilla, bone drilling is associated with fewer local bone heating during implantation. Host factors do not affect the bone thermal changes significantly.
Keywords:
bone condensing / bone drilling / implant placement / low-density bone / real-time thermographySource:
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2014, 25, 8, 910-918Publisher:
- Wiley, Hoboken
Funding / projects:
- Multiscale Methods and Their Applicatios in Nanomedicine (RS-174028)
- Interraction of etiopathogenetic mechanisms of periodontal disease and periimplantitis with the systemic disorders of the present day (RS-41008)
DOI: 10.1111/clr.12191
ISSN: 0905-7161
PubMed: 23710900
WoS: 000339388500005
Scopus: 2-s2.0-84903878114
Collections
Institution/Community
Stomatološki fakultetTY - JOUR AU - Marković, Aleksa AU - Mišić, Tijana AU - Mancić, Dragan AU - Jovanović, Igor AU - Šćepanović, Miodrag AU - Jezdić, Zoran PY - 2014 UR - https://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1877 AB - Objectives: To compare the effect of two surgical techniques, lateral condensation and bone drilling, on changes in temperature of the adjacent low-density bone during implant placement into posterior maxilla and to investigate the influence of the host factors - age, gender, region of implantation, bone density, and thickness of the cortical bone at the recipient sites. Material and methods: Local bone temperature was measured thermographically during implant placement into posterior maxilla following lateral bone condensing (test group) or bone drilling (controls). The main study outcomes were baseline bone temperature prior to implantation and maximum bone temperature recorded during implantation. Early implant success was evaluated after 6 months of healing. Results: A total of 40 implants were randomly allocated to test and control groups and placed into maxillary premolar and/or molar region of 18 participants of both genders and average age of 51.74 years. All recorded bone temperatures were below the threshold for thermal necrosis. Although both groups showed significant increase in bone temperature during implant placement procedure (P lt = 0.0005), it was significantly higher for bone condensing compared with drilling (P lt = 0.0005; 3.79 +/- 1.54 degrees C; 1.91 +/- 0.70 degrees C respectively). No host factor was singled out as a significant predictor of bone temperature changes, although trend of higher increase was observed in young patients, regardless of gender, during implant placement procedure into maxillary first premolar region with bone density type 3 and cortical layer thicker than 1 mm. Early implant success rate after 6 months follow-up was 100%. Conclusion: Although both surgical techniques, bone condensing and bone drilling, can be considered safe regarding their thermal effect on the bone of posterior maxilla, bone drilling is associated with fewer local bone heating during implantation. Host factors do not affect the bone thermal changes significantly. PB - Wiley, Hoboken T2 - Clinical Oral Implants Research T1 - Real-time thermographic analysis of low-density bone during implant placement: a randomized parallel-group clinical study comparing lateral condensation with bone drilling surgical technique VL - 25 IS - 8 SP - 910 EP - 918 DO - 10.1111/clr.12191 ER -
@article{ author = "Marković, Aleksa and Mišić, Tijana and Mancić, Dragan and Jovanović, Igor and Šćepanović, Miodrag and Jezdić, Zoran", year = "2014", abstract = "Objectives: To compare the effect of two surgical techniques, lateral condensation and bone drilling, on changes in temperature of the adjacent low-density bone during implant placement into posterior maxilla and to investigate the influence of the host factors - age, gender, region of implantation, bone density, and thickness of the cortical bone at the recipient sites. Material and methods: Local bone temperature was measured thermographically during implant placement into posterior maxilla following lateral bone condensing (test group) or bone drilling (controls). The main study outcomes were baseline bone temperature prior to implantation and maximum bone temperature recorded during implantation. Early implant success was evaluated after 6 months of healing. Results: A total of 40 implants were randomly allocated to test and control groups and placed into maxillary premolar and/or molar region of 18 participants of both genders and average age of 51.74 years. All recorded bone temperatures were below the threshold for thermal necrosis. Although both groups showed significant increase in bone temperature during implant placement procedure (P lt = 0.0005), it was significantly higher for bone condensing compared with drilling (P lt = 0.0005; 3.79 +/- 1.54 degrees C; 1.91 +/- 0.70 degrees C respectively). No host factor was singled out as a significant predictor of bone temperature changes, although trend of higher increase was observed in young patients, regardless of gender, during implant placement procedure into maxillary first premolar region with bone density type 3 and cortical layer thicker than 1 mm. Early implant success rate after 6 months follow-up was 100%. Conclusion: Although both surgical techniques, bone condensing and bone drilling, can be considered safe regarding their thermal effect on the bone of posterior maxilla, bone drilling is associated with fewer local bone heating during implantation. Host factors do not affect the bone thermal changes significantly.", publisher = "Wiley, Hoboken", journal = "Clinical Oral Implants Research", title = "Real-time thermographic analysis of low-density bone during implant placement: a randomized parallel-group clinical study comparing lateral condensation with bone drilling surgical technique", volume = "25", number = "8", pages = "910-918", doi = "10.1111/clr.12191" }
Marković, A., Mišić, T., Mancić, D., Jovanović, I., Šćepanović, M.,& Jezdić, Z.. (2014). Real-time thermographic analysis of low-density bone during implant placement: a randomized parallel-group clinical study comparing lateral condensation with bone drilling surgical technique. in Clinical Oral Implants Research Wiley, Hoboken., 25(8), 910-918. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12191
Marković A, Mišić T, Mancić D, Jovanović I, Šćepanović M, Jezdić Z. Real-time thermographic analysis of low-density bone during implant placement: a randomized parallel-group clinical study comparing lateral condensation with bone drilling surgical technique. in Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2014;25(8):910-918. doi:10.1111/clr.12191 .
Marković, Aleksa, Mišić, Tijana, Mancić, Dragan, Jovanović, Igor, Šćepanović, Miodrag, Jezdić, Zoran, "Real-time thermographic analysis of low-density bone during implant placement: a randomized parallel-group clinical study comparing lateral condensation with bone drilling surgical technique" in Clinical Oral Implants Research, 25, no. 8 (2014):910-918, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12191 . .