SMILE – Repository of the Faculty of Dental Medicine
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Dental Medicine
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   SMILE
  • Stomatološki fakultet
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
  •   SMILE
  • Stomatološki fakultet
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Polymerization efficiency and flexural strength of low-stress restorative composites

Authorized Users Only
2014
Authors
Goracci, Cecilia
Cadenaro, Milena
Fontanive, Luca
Giangrosso, Giuseppe
Juloski, Jelena
Vichi, Alessandro
Ferrari, Marco
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Objectives.To assess depth of cure (DOC), degree of conversion (DC), and flexural strength( FS) of several resin composites with low-stress behavior. Methods. SonicFill (Kerr), SureFil((R)) SDRTM (Dentsply), everX Posterior (GC), Kalore (GC), and Filtek Silorane (3M ESPE) were tested. DOC was measured with the Acetone Shake test. DC was assessed with Fourier Transform Infra-Red spectroscopy on top and at the bottom of 4 mm-thick disk-shaped specimens. Bottom to top ratios of DC percentages were calculated. FS was evaluated with the Three-Point Bending test. DOC, DC, and FS data were statistically analyzed. Results. SureFil((R)) SDRTM and everX Posterior achieved significantly greater DOC than Kalore and Filtek Silorane. Also, SonicFill had significantly greater DOC than Filtek Silorane. Mean top DCs ranged between 71.46% and 52.44%. Kalore and everX Posterior had significantly lower top DCs than the other materials. Mean DC values at 4 mm ranged largely from 57.95% to 6.82%. Kalore and... Filtek Silorane had the lowest values of bottom DC and the difference was statistically significant. EverX Posterior and SonicFill recorded significantly higher FSs than the other materials. Significance. SureFil((R)) SDRTM and everX Posterior exhibited DOC over 4 mm, the maximum thickness recommended for bulk placement, while SonicFill recorded DOC values very close to the 4 mm threshold. SonicFill achieved the highest DC at the irradiated surface, as well as at 4 mm depth. SureFil((R)) SDRTM demonstrated similarly uniform curing through the bulk increment. All the tested composites complied with the requirements of FS established by ISO 4049/2009.

Keywords:
Bulk-fill / Flexural strength / Low-stress / Polymerization / Resin compositea
Source:
Dental Materials, 2014, 30, 6, 688-694
Publisher:
  • Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.03.006

ISSN: 0109-5641

PubMed: 24703547

WoS: 000335924300012

Scopus: 2-s2.0-84900816289
[ Google Scholar ]
96
81
URI
https://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1899
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača
Institution/Community
Stomatološki fakultet
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Goracci, Cecilia
AU  - Cadenaro, Milena
AU  - Fontanive, Luca
AU  - Giangrosso, Giuseppe
AU  - Juloski, Jelena
AU  - Vichi, Alessandro
AU  - Ferrari, Marco
PY  - 2014
UR  - https://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1899
AB  - Objectives.To assess depth of cure (DOC), degree of conversion (DC), and flexural strength( FS) of several resin composites with low-stress behavior. Methods. SonicFill (Kerr), SureFil((R)) SDRTM (Dentsply), everX Posterior (GC), Kalore (GC), and Filtek Silorane (3M ESPE) were tested. DOC was measured with the Acetone Shake test. DC was assessed with Fourier Transform Infra-Red spectroscopy on top and at the bottom of 4 mm-thick disk-shaped specimens. Bottom to top ratios of DC percentages were calculated. FS was evaluated with the Three-Point Bending test. DOC, DC, and FS data were statistically analyzed. Results. SureFil((R)) SDRTM and everX Posterior achieved significantly greater DOC than Kalore and Filtek Silorane. Also, SonicFill had significantly greater DOC than Filtek Silorane. Mean top DCs ranged between 71.46% and 52.44%. Kalore and everX Posterior had significantly lower top DCs than the other materials. Mean DC values at 4 mm ranged largely from 57.95% to 6.82%. Kalore and Filtek Silorane had the lowest values of bottom DC and the difference was statistically significant. EverX Posterior and SonicFill recorded significantly higher FSs than the other materials. Significance. SureFil((R)) SDRTM and everX Posterior exhibited DOC over 4 mm, the maximum thickness recommended for bulk placement, while SonicFill recorded DOC values very close to the 4 mm threshold. SonicFill achieved the highest DC at the irradiated surface, as well as at 4 mm depth. SureFil((R)) SDRTM demonstrated similarly uniform curing through the bulk increment. All the tested composites complied with the requirements of FS established by ISO 4049/2009.
PB  - Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford
T2  - Dental Materials
T1  - Polymerization efficiency and flexural strength of low-stress restorative composites
VL  - 30
IS  - 6
SP  - 688
EP  - 694
DO  - 10.1016/j.dental.2014.03.006
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Goracci, Cecilia and Cadenaro, Milena and Fontanive, Luca and Giangrosso, Giuseppe and Juloski, Jelena and Vichi, Alessandro and Ferrari, Marco",
year = "2014",
abstract = "Objectives.To assess depth of cure (DOC), degree of conversion (DC), and flexural strength( FS) of several resin composites with low-stress behavior. Methods. SonicFill (Kerr), SureFil((R)) SDRTM (Dentsply), everX Posterior (GC), Kalore (GC), and Filtek Silorane (3M ESPE) were tested. DOC was measured with the Acetone Shake test. DC was assessed with Fourier Transform Infra-Red spectroscopy on top and at the bottom of 4 mm-thick disk-shaped specimens. Bottom to top ratios of DC percentages were calculated. FS was evaluated with the Three-Point Bending test. DOC, DC, and FS data were statistically analyzed. Results. SureFil((R)) SDRTM and everX Posterior achieved significantly greater DOC than Kalore and Filtek Silorane. Also, SonicFill had significantly greater DOC than Filtek Silorane. Mean top DCs ranged between 71.46% and 52.44%. Kalore and everX Posterior had significantly lower top DCs than the other materials. Mean DC values at 4 mm ranged largely from 57.95% to 6.82%. Kalore and Filtek Silorane had the lowest values of bottom DC and the difference was statistically significant. EverX Posterior and SonicFill recorded significantly higher FSs than the other materials. Significance. SureFil((R)) SDRTM and everX Posterior exhibited DOC over 4 mm, the maximum thickness recommended for bulk placement, while SonicFill recorded DOC values very close to the 4 mm threshold. SonicFill achieved the highest DC at the irradiated surface, as well as at 4 mm depth. SureFil((R)) SDRTM demonstrated similarly uniform curing through the bulk increment. All the tested composites complied with the requirements of FS established by ISO 4049/2009.",
publisher = "Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford",
journal = "Dental Materials",
title = "Polymerization efficiency and flexural strength of low-stress restorative composites",
volume = "30",
number = "6",
pages = "688-694",
doi = "10.1016/j.dental.2014.03.006"
}
Goracci, C., Cadenaro, M., Fontanive, L., Giangrosso, G., Juloski, J., Vichi, A.,& Ferrari, M.. (2014). Polymerization efficiency and flexural strength of low-stress restorative composites. in Dental Materials
Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford., 30(6), 688-694.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.03.006
Goracci C, Cadenaro M, Fontanive L, Giangrosso G, Juloski J, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Polymerization efficiency and flexural strength of low-stress restorative composites. in Dental Materials. 2014;30(6):688-694.
doi:10.1016/j.dental.2014.03.006 .
Goracci, Cecilia, Cadenaro, Milena, Fontanive, Luca, Giangrosso, Giuseppe, Juloski, Jelena, Vichi, Alessandro, Ferrari, Marco, "Polymerization efficiency and flexural strength of low-stress restorative composites" in Dental Materials, 30, no. 6 (2014):688-694,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.03.006 . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About Smile – School of dental Medicine dIgitaL archivE | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About Smile – School of dental Medicine dIgitaL archivE | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB