SMILE – Repository of the Faculty of Dental Medicine
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Dental Medicine
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   SMILE
  • Stomatološki fakultet
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
  •   SMILE
  • Stomatološki fakultet
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Comparative analysis on measuring performances of dental intraoral and extraoral optical 3D digitization systems

Authorized Users Only
2014
Authors
Trifković, Branka
Budak, Igor
Todorović, Aleksandar
Vukelić, Đorđe
Lazić, Vojkan
Puškar, Tatjana
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Implementation of the methods of 3D digitization in dental practice is a modern and sophisticated alternative to the method of conventional impressions. Among many different methods of 3D digitization applied in dentistry, optical methods can be considered as today mostly applied, especially in the field of prosthodontics. The developments of this kind of systems have converged in two main directions - extraoral and intraoral systems. The main quality parameters for evaluating measuring performances of 3D digitization methods and systems include accuracy and precision. By introducing LED blue light in intra-and extraoral cameras, the Cerec system has significantly improved the quality of 3D digitization results. As the technical features of cameras in both types of systems are identical and the difference of the digitization methods is connected only to operating environments, the main goal of the research was to analyze whether different digitization conditions significantly influence... the systems' measuring performances. Analyzes were focused on investigating accuracy and precision of two mentioned specialized dental optical systems on the basis of CAD inspection, with special attention on evaluating statistically significant differences within the obtained results. Statistically significant difference was not found in systems' precision, while the extra oral system was found as of significantly higher accuracy.

Keywords:
3D digitization / Optical dental systems / Measuring performances / Accuracy / Precision
Source:
Measurement, 2014, 47, 45-53
Publisher:
  • Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford
Funding / projects:
  • Research and development of modelling methods and approaches in manufacturing of dental recoveries with the application of modern technologies and computer aided systems (RS-35020)

DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2013.08.051

ISSN: 0263-2241

WoS: 000328196600008

Scopus: 2-s2.0-84883739122
[ Google Scholar ]
35
25
URI
https://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1931
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača
Institution/Community
Stomatološki fakultet
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Trifković, Branka
AU  - Budak, Igor
AU  - Todorović, Aleksandar
AU  - Vukelić, Đorđe
AU  - Lazić, Vojkan
AU  - Puškar, Tatjana
PY  - 2014
UR  - https://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1931
AB  - Implementation of the methods of 3D digitization in dental practice is a modern and sophisticated alternative to the method of conventional impressions. Among many different methods of 3D digitization applied in dentistry, optical methods can be considered as today mostly applied, especially in the field of prosthodontics. The developments of this kind of systems have converged in two main directions - extraoral and intraoral systems. The main quality parameters for evaluating measuring performances of 3D digitization methods and systems include accuracy and precision. By introducing LED blue light in intra-and extraoral cameras, the Cerec system has significantly improved the quality of 3D digitization results. As the technical features of cameras in both types of systems are identical and the difference of the digitization methods is connected only to operating environments, the main goal of the research was to analyze whether different digitization conditions significantly influence the systems' measuring performances. Analyzes were focused on investigating accuracy and precision of two mentioned specialized dental optical systems on the basis of CAD inspection, with special attention on evaluating statistically significant differences within the obtained results. Statistically significant difference was not found in systems' precision, while the extra oral system was found as of significantly higher accuracy.
PB  - Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford
T2  - Measurement
T1  - Comparative analysis on measuring performances of dental intraoral and extraoral optical 3D digitization systems
VL  - 47
SP  - 45
EP  - 53
DO  - 10.1016/j.measurement.2013.08.051
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Trifković, Branka and Budak, Igor and Todorović, Aleksandar and Vukelić, Đorđe and Lazić, Vojkan and Puškar, Tatjana",
year = "2014",
abstract = "Implementation of the methods of 3D digitization in dental practice is a modern and sophisticated alternative to the method of conventional impressions. Among many different methods of 3D digitization applied in dentistry, optical methods can be considered as today mostly applied, especially in the field of prosthodontics. The developments of this kind of systems have converged in two main directions - extraoral and intraoral systems. The main quality parameters for evaluating measuring performances of 3D digitization methods and systems include accuracy and precision. By introducing LED blue light in intra-and extraoral cameras, the Cerec system has significantly improved the quality of 3D digitization results. As the technical features of cameras in both types of systems are identical and the difference of the digitization methods is connected only to operating environments, the main goal of the research was to analyze whether different digitization conditions significantly influence the systems' measuring performances. Analyzes were focused on investigating accuracy and precision of two mentioned specialized dental optical systems on the basis of CAD inspection, with special attention on evaluating statistically significant differences within the obtained results. Statistically significant difference was not found in systems' precision, while the extra oral system was found as of significantly higher accuracy.",
publisher = "Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford",
journal = "Measurement",
title = "Comparative analysis on measuring performances of dental intraoral and extraoral optical 3D digitization systems",
volume = "47",
pages = "45-53",
doi = "10.1016/j.measurement.2013.08.051"
}
Trifković, B., Budak, I., Todorović, A., Vukelić, Đ., Lazić, V.,& Puškar, T.. (2014). Comparative analysis on measuring performances of dental intraoral and extraoral optical 3D digitization systems. in Measurement
Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford., 47, 45-53.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.08.051
Trifković B, Budak I, Todorović A, Vukelić Đ, Lazić V, Puškar T. Comparative analysis on measuring performances of dental intraoral and extraoral optical 3D digitization systems. in Measurement. 2014;47:45-53.
doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2013.08.051 .
Trifković, Branka, Budak, Igor, Todorović, Aleksandar, Vukelić, Đorđe, Lazić, Vojkan, Puškar, Tatjana, "Comparative analysis on measuring performances of dental intraoral and extraoral optical 3D digitization systems" in Measurement, 47 (2014):45-53,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.08.051 . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About Smile – School of dental Medicine dIgitaL archivE | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About Smile – School of dental Medicine dIgitaL archivE | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB