Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorPerez-Albacete Martinez, Carlos
dc.creatorVlahović, Zoran
dc.creatorŠćepanović, Miodrag
dc.creatorVidenović, Goran
dc.creatorBarone, Antonio
dc.creatorCalvo Guirado, Jose Luis
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-02T13:03:31Z
dc.date.available2020-07-02T13:03:31Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161
dc.identifier.urihttps://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2095
dc.description.abstractObjectivesThe aim of our study was to compare osseointegration and peri-implant crestal bone resorption in submerged flapless and conventional flap surgery over a 12-month follow-up. Materials and methodsThe study used five domestic pigs. Implants were inserted 9weeks after tooth extraction. Each animal received six implants in the mandible, following a split-mouth design: one side was treated using a flapless technique using mini-incisions, while a flap was raised on the other. The animals were sacrificed at 2weeks, 1, 3, 6 and 12months after implant placement. Radiographic images were taken to analyze crestal bone loss, and samples were extracted for histopathological and bone-to-implant contact (BIC) analyses. ResultsSignificantly, greater crestal bone loss (P=0.005) was obtained in the flap group compared with the flapless group. The flapless group presented significantly higher percentages of BIC (P lt 0.05) at 3, 6 and 12months compared with the conventional flap group. ConclusionsWithin the limitations of this experimental animal study, it may be concluded that the type of surgery (flap or flapless) affects peri-implant bone preservation and osseointegration of regular platform implants. Flapless surgery is associated with peri-implant crestal bone preservation. Flapless surgery in combination with submerged implants allows higher osseointegration values.en
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell, Hoboken
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceClinical Oral Implants Research
dc.subjectbone-to-implant contacten
dc.subjectcrestal bone lossen
dc.subjectflaplessen
dc.subjectmini-incisionen
dc.titleSubmerged flapless technique vs. conventional flap approach for implant placement: experimental domestic pig study with 12-month follow-upen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dcterms.abstractПерез-Aлбацете Мартинез, Царлос; Влаховић, Зоран; Шћепановић, Миодраг; Виденовић, Горан; Цалво Гуирадо, Јосе Луис; Бароне, Aнтонио;
dc.citation.volume27
dc.citation.issue8
dc.citation.spage964
dc.citation.epage968
dc.citation.other27(8): 964-968
dc.citation.rankaM21
dc.identifier.wos000380958000005
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/clr.12665
dc.identifier.pmid26147852
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85030787268
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу