Show simple item record

dc.creatorFerrari, Marco
dc.creatorSorrentino, Roberto
dc.creatorJuloski, Jelena
dc.creatorGrandini, Simone
dc.creatorCarrabba, Michele
dc.creatorDiscepoli, N.
dc.creatorFerrari Cagidiaco, E.
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-02T13:10:46Z
dc.date.available2020-07-02T13:10:46Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn0022-0345
dc.identifier.urihttps://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2211
dc.description.abstractBiomechanical integrity of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) is often compromised. Degree of hard tissue loss and type of final prosthetic restoration should be carefully considered when making a treatment plan. The objective of this prospective clinical trial was to assess the influence of the type of prosthetic restoration as well as the degree of hard tissue loss on 7-y clinical performance of ETT restored with fiber posts. Two groups (n = 60) were defined depending on the type of prosthetic restoration needed: 1) single unit porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) crowns (SCs) and 2) 3- to 4-unit PFM fixed dental prostheses (FDPs), with 1 healthy and 1 endodontically treated and fiber post-restored abutment. Within each group, samples were divided into 2 subgroups (n = 30) according to the amount of residual coronal tissues after abutment buildup and final preparation: A) >50% of coronal residual structure or B) equal to or lt 50% of coronal residual structure. The clinical outcome was assessed based on clinical and intraoral radiographic examinations at the recalls after 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 84 mo. Data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier log-rank test and Cox regression analysis (P lt 0.05). The overall 7-y survival rate of ETT restored with fiber post and either SCs or FDPs was 69.2%. The highest 84-mo survival rate was recorded in group 1A (90%), whereas teeth in group 2B exhibited the lowest performance (56.7% survival rate). The log-rank test detected statistically significant differences in survival rates among the groups (P = 0.048). Cox regression analysis revealed that the amount of residual coronal structure (P = 0.041; hazard ratio [HR], 2.026; 95% confidence interval [CI] for HR, 1.031-3.982) and the interaction between the type of prosthetic restoration and the amount of residual coronal structure (P = 0.024; HR, 1.372; 95% CI for HR, 1.042-1.806) were statistically significant factors for survival.en
dc.publisherSage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.sourceJournal of Dental Research
dc.subjectendodonticsen
dc.subjectprosthetic dentistry/prosthodonticsen
dc.subjectclinical trialen
dc.subjectdental restoration failureen
dc.subjectdental prosthesisen
dc.subjectdental bondingen
dc.titlePost-Retained Single Crowns versus Fixed Dental Prostheses: A 7-Year Prospective Clinical Studyen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dcterms.abstractСоррентино, Роберто; Царрабба, Мицхеле; Феррари Цагидиацо, Е.; Јулоски, Јелена; Грандини, Симоне; Феррари, Марцо; Дисцеполи, Н.;
dc.citation.volume96
dc.citation.issue13
dc.citation.spage1490
dc.citation.epage1497
dc.citation.other96(13): 1490-1497
dc.citation.rankaM21
dc.identifier.wos000415925000004
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0022034517724146
dc.identifier.pmid28771388
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85034762666
dc.identifier.fulltexthttps://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/793/2206.pdf
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record