Histopathological comparative analysis of periimplant bone inflammatory response after dental implant insertion using flap and flapless surgical technique. An experimental study in pigs
Authorized Users Only
2017
Authors
Vlahović, ZoranMarković, Aleksa

Lazić, Zoran
Šćepanović, Miodrag
Đinić, Ana

Kalanović, Milena
Article (Published version)

Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
AimTo evaluate by histopathological analysis the peri-implant bone inflammation degree, in certain time intervals (7, 14, 21 and 28days), following mini-incision flapless and flap implant placement. Material and methodsThe experiment was conducted on four domestic pigs. Nine weeks prior to implant insertion, second and third mandibular premolars were extracted. Each animal received six implants in lower jaw. On one randomly chosen side of jaw flapless technique using mini-incision was performed, while on the other side implants were inserted after flap raising. After 7, 14, 21, and 28days, the experimental animals were sacrificed. Following mandibular resection and decalcification, the samples for histopathological analysis of the peri-implant bone were obtained in the empty implant bed area, from the buccal side of the mandible, adjacent to implant neck region and parallel to crestal edge of implant bed. The degree of inflammatory response of the peri-implant bone was estimated throug...h ordinal scores from 0 to 2. ResultsSeven days after the surgery all samples in the flap group had score 2 indicating high inflammation degree, in contrast to lower inflammatory reaction in flapless group. On the 14th and 21st postoperative day decreasing of inflammation degree was noted in all samples of the flapless group (score 1), while in flap group samples presented scores 1 and 2. Twenty-eight days after the implant placement, further reduction of inflammation in the flapless group (33% of samples had score 0) was observed. ConclusionFlapless technique in comparison to conventional flap procedure minimizes postoperative bone inflammatory reactions.
Keywords:
dental implant placement / flap / flapless / histopathology / inflammation / peri-implant boneSource:
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2017, 28, 9, 1067-1073Publisher:
- Wiley, Hoboken
Funding / projects:
DOI: 10.1111/clr.12919
ISSN: 0905-7161
PubMed: 27393033
WoS: 000409448600012
Scopus: 2-s2.0-84978907386
Collections
Institution/Community
Stomatološki fakultetTY - JOUR AU - Vlahović, Zoran AU - Marković, Aleksa AU - Lazić, Zoran AU - Šćepanović, Miodrag AU - Đinić, Ana AU - Kalanović, Milena PY - 2017 UR - https://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2219 AB - AimTo evaluate by histopathological analysis the peri-implant bone inflammation degree, in certain time intervals (7, 14, 21 and 28days), following mini-incision flapless and flap implant placement. Material and methodsThe experiment was conducted on four domestic pigs. Nine weeks prior to implant insertion, second and third mandibular premolars were extracted. Each animal received six implants in lower jaw. On one randomly chosen side of jaw flapless technique using mini-incision was performed, while on the other side implants were inserted after flap raising. After 7, 14, 21, and 28days, the experimental animals were sacrificed. Following mandibular resection and decalcification, the samples for histopathological analysis of the peri-implant bone were obtained in the empty implant bed area, from the buccal side of the mandible, adjacent to implant neck region and parallel to crestal edge of implant bed. The degree of inflammatory response of the peri-implant bone was estimated through ordinal scores from 0 to 2. ResultsSeven days after the surgery all samples in the flap group had score 2 indicating high inflammation degree, in contrast to lower inflammatory reaction in flapless group. On the 14th and 21st postoperative day decreasing of inflammation degree was noted in all samples of the flapless group (score 1), while in flap group samples presented scores 1 and 2. Twenty-eight days after the implant placement, further reduction of inflammation in the flapless group (33% of samples had score 0) was observed. ConclusionFlapless technique in comparison to conventional flap procedure minimizes postoperative bone inflammatory reactions. PB - Wiley, Hoboken T2 - Clinical Oral Implants Research T1 - Histopathological comparative analysis of periimplant bone inflammatory response after dental implant insertion using flap and flapless surgical technique. An experimental study in pigs VL - 28 IS - 9 SP - 1067 EP - 1073 DO - 10.1111/clr.12919 ER -
@article{ author = "Vlahović, Zoran and Marković, Aleksa and Lazić, Zoran and Šćepanović, Miodrag and Đinić, Ana and Kalanović, Milena", year = "2017", abstract = "AimTo evaluate by histopathological analysis the peri-implant bone inflammation degree, in certain time intervals (7, 14, 21 and 28days), following mini-incision flapless and flap implant placement. Material and methodsThe experiment was conducted on four domestic pigs. Nine weeks prior to implant insertion, second and third mandibular premolars were extracted. Each animal received six implants in lower jaw. On one randomly chosen side of jaw flapless technique using mini-incision was performed, while on the other side implants were inserted after flap raising. After 7, 14, 21, and 28days, the experimental animals were sacrificed. Following mandibular resection and decalcification, the samples for histopathological analysis of the peri-implant bone were obtained in the empty implant bed area, from the buccal side of the mandible, adjacent to implant neck region and parallel to crestal edge of implant bed. The degree of inflammatory response of the peri-implant bone was estimated through ordinal scores from 0 to 2. ResultsSeven days after the surgery all samples in the flap group had score 2 indicating high inflammation degree, in contrast to lower inflammatory reaction in flapless group. On the 14th and 21st postoperative day decreasing of inflammation degree was noted in all samples of the flapless group (score 1), while in flap group samples presented scores 1 and 2. Twenty-eight days after the implant placement, further reduction of inflammation in the flapless group (33% of samples had score 0) was observed. ConclusionFlapless technique in comparison to conventional flap procedure minimizes postoperative bone inflammatory reactions.", publisher = "Wiley, Hoboken", journal = "Clinical Oral Implants Research", title = "Histopathological comparative analysis of periimplant bone inflammatory response after dental implant insertion using flap and flapless surgical technique. An experimental study in pigs", volume = "28", number = "9", pages = "1067-1073", doi = "10.1111/clr.12919" }
Vlahović, Z., Marković, A., Lazić, Z., Šćepanović, M., Đinić, A.,& Kalanović, M.. (2017). Histopathological comparative analysis of periimplant bone inflammatory response after dental implant insertion using flap and flapless surgical technique. An experimental study in pigs. in Clinical Oral Implants Research Wiley, Hoboken., 28(9), 1067-1073. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12919
Vlahović Z, Marković A, Lazić Z, Šćepanović M, Đinić A, Kalanović M. Histopathological comparative analysis of periimplant bone inflammatory response after dental implant insertion using flap and flapless surgical technique. An experimental study in pigs. in Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2017;28(9):1067-1073. doi:10.1111/clr.12919 .
Vlahović, Zoran, Marković, Aleksa, Lazić, Zoran, Šćepanović, Miodrag, Đinić, Ana, Kalanović, Milena, "Histopathological comparative analysis of periimplant bone inflammatory response after dental implant insertion using flap and flapless surgical technique. An experimental study in pigs" in Clinical Oral Implants Research, 28, no. 9 (2017):1067-1073, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12919 . .