What is the Impact of Epstein-Barr Virus in Peri-implant Infection?
Authorized Users Only
2018
Authors
Canullo, LuigiPesce, Paolo

Botticelli, Daniele
Covani, Ugo

Janković, Saša
Jovanović, Tanja
Rakić, Mia

Article (Published version)

Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Purpose: To compare the qualitative and quantitative profile of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) at external and internal implant surfaces between participants with peri-implantitis and healthy peri-implant tissues and to quantitatively assess the relation between EBV and periopathogens inside the microbiologic profile associated with peri-implantitis. Materials and Methods: Microbiologic specimens were retrieved from 84 patients wearing 190 implants to estimate the levels of EBV and 10 periopathogens in the peri-implant pocket and internal-implant connection using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Results: The study sample consisted of 113 healthy and 77 peri-implantitis-affected implants. Statistical significance was not reached in EBV prevalence between peri-implantitis and healthy controls. EBV-positive participants demonstrated higher levels of Prevotella intermedia (Pi) and Campylobacter rectus (Cr) compared with EBV-negative participants. A positive correlation was demonstrated am...ong EBV and Tannerella forsythia (Tf), Parvimonas micra (Pm), Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn), and Cr levels in peri-implantitis-affected implants, while healthy controls demonstrated a positive correlation between EBV and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (Aa), Pi, and Pm. Conclusion: EBV cannot be considered as a microbiologic marker of peri-implantitis. However, EBV could be considered as a risk factor and a peri-implantitis enhancer based on its positive correlations with pathogens associated with peri-implantitis.
Keywords:
Campylobacter rectus / Epstein-Barr virus infections / Fusobacterium nucleatum / peri-implantitis / Prevotella intermediaSource:
International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 2018, 33, 1, 58-63Publisher:
- Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, Hanover Park
Funding / projects:
- Interraction of etiopathogenetic mechanisms of periodontal disease and periimplantitis with the systemic disorders of the present day (RS-41008)
- Brain plasticity in aging: effect of dietary restriction and anesthesia (RS-173056)
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.5972
ISSN: 0882-2786
PubMed: 29340343
WoS: 000424190000008
Scopus: 2-s2.0-85041856928
Collections
Institution/Community
Stomatološki fakultetTY - JOUR AU - Canullo, Luigi AU - Pesce, Paolo AU - Botticelli, Daniele AU - Covani, Ugo AU - Janković, Saša AU - Jovanović, Tanja AU - Rakić, Mia PY - 2018 UR - https://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2309 AB - Purpose: To compare the qualitative and quantitative profile of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) at external and internal implant surfaces between participants with peri-implantitis and healthy peri-implant tissues and to quantitatively assess the relation between EBV and periopathogens inside the microbiologic profile associated with peri-implantitis. Materials and Methods: Microbiologic specimens were retrieved from 84 patients wearing 190 implants to estimate the levels of EBV and 10 periopathogens in the peri-implant pocket and internal-implant connection using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Results: The study sample consisted of 113 healthy and 77 peri-implantitis-affected implants. Statistical significance was not reached in EBV prevalence between peri-implantitis and healthy controls. EBV-positive participants demonstrated higher levels of Prevotella intermedia (Pi) and Campylobacter rectus (Cr) compared with EBV-negative participants. A positive correlation was demonstrated among EBV and Tannerella forsythia (Tf), Parvimonas micra (Pm), Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn), and Cr levels in peri-implantitis-affected implants, while healthy controls demonstrated a positive correlation between EBV and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (Aa), Pi, and Pm. Conclusion: EBV cannot be considered as a microbiologic marker of peri-implantitis. However, EBV could be considered as a risk factor and a peri-implantitis enhancer based on its positive correlations with pathogens associated with peri-implantitis. PB - Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, Hanover Park T2 - International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants T1 - What is the Impact of Epstein-Barr Virus in Peri-implant Infection? VL - 33 IS - 1 SP - 58 EP - 63 DO - 10.11607/jomi.5972 ER -
@article{ author = "Canullo, Luigi and Pesce, Paolo and Botticelli, Daniele and Covani, Ugo and Janković, Saša and Jovanović, Tanja and Rakić, Mia", year = "2018", abstract = "Purpose: To compare the qualitative and quantitative profile of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) at external and internal implant surfaces between participants with peri-implantitis and healthy peri-implant tissues and to quantitatively assess the relation between EBV and periopathogens inside the microbiologic profile associated with peri-implantitis. Materials and Methods: Microbiologic specimens were retrieved from 84 patients wearing 190 implants to estimate the levels of EBV and 10 periopathogens in the peri-implant pocket and internal-implant connection using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Results: The study sample consisted of 113 healthy and 77 peri-implantitis-affected implants. Statistical significance was not reached in EBV prevalence between peri-implantitis and healthy controls. EBV-positive participants demonstrated higher levels of Prevotella intermedia (Pi) and Campylobacter rectus (Cr) compared with EBV-negative participants. A positive correlation was demonstrated among EBV and Tannerella forsythia (Tf), Parvimonas micra (Pm), Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn), and Cr levels in peri-implantitis-affected implants, while healthy controls demonstrated a positive correlation between EBV and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (Aa), Pi, and Pm. Conclusion: EBV cannot be considered as a microbiologic marker of peri-implantitis. However, EBV could be considered as a risk factor and a peri-implantitis enhancer based on its positive correlations with pathogens associated with peri-implantitis.", publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, Hanover Park", journal = "International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants", title = "What is the Impact of Epstein-Barr Virus in Peri-implant Infection?", volume = "33", number = "1", pages = "58-63", doi = "10.11607/jomi.5972" }
Canullo, L., Pesce, P., Botticelli, D., Covani, U., Janković, S., Jovanović, T.,& Rakić, M.. (2018). What is the Impact of Epstein-Barr Virus in Peri-implant Infection?. in International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, Hanover Park., 33(1), 58-63. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5972
Canullo L, Pesce P, Botticelli D, Covani U, Janković S, Jovanović T, Rakić M. What is the Impact of Epstein-Barr Virus in Peri-implant Infection?. in International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2018;33(1):58-63. doi:10.11607/jomi.5972 .
Canullo, Luigi, Pesce, Paolo, Botticelli, Daniele, Covani, Ugo, Janković, Saša, Jovanović, Tanja, Rakić, Mia, "What is the Impact of Epstein-Barr Virus in Peri-implant Infection?" in International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 33, no. 1 (2018):58-63, https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5972 . .