Show simple item record

dc.creatorMiletić, Ivana
dc.creatorBaraba, Anja
dc.creatorBasso, Matteo
dc.creatorPulcini, Maria Giulia
dc.creatorMarković, Dejan
dc.creatorPerić, Tamara
dc.creatorOzkaya, Cigdem Atalayin
dc.creatorTurkun, Lezize Sebnem
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-02T13:27:30Z
dc.date.available2020-07-02T13:27:30Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1461-5185
dc.identifier.urihttp://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2476
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare the clinical performance of a glass hybrid restorative system, EQUIA Forte, with that of a nanohybrid resin composite, Tetric EvoCeram, in two-surface class II cavities. Materials and Methods: This multicenter, randomized controlled clinical study was conducted at four different dental schools. In total, 360 restorations were placed in patients in need of two class-II, two-surface restorations in the molar region of the same jaw. Each patient received one glass hybrid restoration (EQUIA Forte, GC) and one resin composite restoration (Tetric EvoCeram, Ivoclar Vivadent). Two independent evaluators performed a clinical evaluation of each site after 1 week (baseline), 1 year, and 2 years using the criteria of the FDI World Dental Federation (FDI-2). Results: The estimated survival rates at the 2-year recall were 93.6% and 94.5% for EQUIA Forte and Tetric EvoCeram, respectively. There were no significant differences in the survival rates or in any of the evaluated esthetic, functional or biological properties between EQUIA Forte and Tetric EvoCeram restorations (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Both the glass-hybrid restorative system and nanohybrid resin composite showed good clinical performance in moderate to large two-surface class II restorations in a 2-year follow-up.en
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Inc, Hanover Park
dc.relationUniversity of Zagreb
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceJournal of Adhesive Dentistry
dc.subjectclinical trialsen
dc.subjectresin compositeen
dc.subjectglass-hybrid systemen
dc.subjectmulticenteren
dc.subjectsplit-mouthen
dc.titleClinical Performance of a Glass-Hybrid System Compared with a Resin Composite in the Posterior Region: Results of a 2-year Multicenter Studyen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dcterms.abstractБараба, Aња; Милетић, Ивана; Марковић, Дејан; Перић, Тамара; Туркун, Лезизе Себнем; Озкаyа, Цигдем Aталаyин; Пулцини, Мариа Гиулиа; Бассо, Маттео;
dc.citation.volume22
dc.citation.issue3
dc.citation.spage235
dc.citation.epage247
dc.citation.other22(3): 235-247
dc.citation.rankM21~
dc.identifier.wos000535962600002
dc.identifier.doi10.3290/j.jad.a44547
dc.identifier.pmid32435764
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85085155921
dc.identifier.rcubconv_3719
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record