Comparative analysis of standard and computerized profile cephalometric diagnostics in orthodontics
Uporedna analiza standardne i kompjuterske metode telerendgen dijagnostike u ortopediji vilica
Apstrakt
Aim: The aim of this research was to compare the standard and computerized method of cephalogram analysis. In this research 32 patients visiting Belgrade University School of Dentistry, dept. of orthodontics were involved. Material and Method: This research was based on cephalogram analysis for every patient. All of the cephalograms were analyzed in two ways: 1. standrad method and 2. computerized method using Nemotec Dental Studio NX 2005 software. Results: Additional possibilities and properties of computer software for the computerized cephalogram analysis caused the differences in results. Conclusion: Based on the results, it can be concluded that there was no statistical difference comparing both methods. Computerized cephalogram analysis provides higher speed and software possibilities compared to standard method.
Cilj: Cilj ovog istraživanja je bio da se uporedi standardni i kompjuterski metod analize profilnog telerendgen snimka glave. Materijal i metod: Istraživanjem je obuhvaćeno ukupno 32 pacijenta Klinike za Ortopediju vilica, Stomatološkog fakulteta u Beogradu. Istraživanje se zasnivalo na analizi profilnog telerendgen snimka glave svakog pacijenta. Svi snimci su analizirani na dva načina: 1. standardnom metodom analize i 2. kompjuterskom metodom pomoću programa Nemotek Dental Studio NX 2005. Rezultati: Razlika u rezultatima dobijena je zbog bolje vidljivosti anatomskih detalja na snimku analiziranom kompjuterskom metodom zbog mogućnosti raznih podešavanja i poboljšanja vidljivosti. Zaključak: Na osnovu dobijenih rezultata može se zaključiti da nema statistički značajne razlike u podacima dobijenim pomoću oba metoda, neuporedivo je brža analiza pomoću kompjuterskog programa i mogućnosti koje pruža kompjuterska analiza prevazilazi okvire standardne analize.
Ključne reči:
computerized and standard analysis / profile cephalogram / kompjuterska i standardna analiza / profilni snimak glaveIzvor:
Stomatološki glasnik Srbije, 2006, 53, 4, 246-252Izdavač:
- Srpsko lekarsko društvo - Stomatološka sekcija, Beograd
Kolekcije
Institucija/grupa
Stomatološki fakultetTY - JOUR AU - Milutinović, Jovana AU - Nedeljković, Nenad AU - Nikolić, Predrag PY - 2006 UR - https://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1320 AB - Aim: The aim of this research was to compare the standard and computerized method of cephalogram analysis. In this research 32 patients visiting Belgrade University School of Dentistry, dept. of orthodontics were involved. Material and Method: This research was based on cephalogram analysis for every patient. All of the cephalograms were analyzed in two ways: 1. standrad method and 2. computerized method using Nemotec Dental Studio NX 2005 software. Results: Additional possibilities and properties of computer software for the computerized cephalogram analysis caused the differences in results. Conclusion: Based on the results, it can be concluded that there was no statistical difference comparing both methods. Computerized cephalogram analysis provides higher speed and software possibilities compared to standard method. AB - Cilj: Cilj ovog istraživanja je bio da se uporedi standardni i kompjuterski metod analize profilnog telerendgen snimka glave. Materijal i metod: Istraživanjem je obuhvaćeno ukupno 32 pacijenta Klinike za Ortopediju vilica, Stomatološkog fakulteta u Beogradu. Istraživanje se zasnivalo na analizi profilnog telerendgen snimka glave svakog pacijenta. Svi snimci su analizirani na dva načina: 1. standardnom metodom analize i 2. kompjuterskom metodom pomoću programa Nemotek Dental Studio NX 2005. Rezultati: Razlika u rezultatima dobijena je zbog bolje vidljivosti anatomskih detalja na snimku analiziranom kompjuterskom metodom zbog mogućnosti raznih podešavanja i poboljšanja vidljivosti. Zaključak: Na osnovu dobijenih rezultata može se zaključiti da nema statistički značajne razlike u podacima dobijenim pomoću oba metoda, neuporedivo je brža analiza pomoću kompjuterskog programa i mogućnosti koje pruža kompjuterska analiza prevazilazi okvire standardne analize. PB - Srpsko lekarsko društvo - Stomatološka sekcija, Beograd T2 - Stomatološki glasnik Srbije T1 - Comparative analysis of standard and computerized profile cephalometric diagnostics in orthodontics T1 - Uporedna analiza standardne i kompjuterske metode telerendgen dijagnostike u ortopediji vilica VL - 53 IS - 4 SP - 246 EP - 252 DO - 10.2298/SGS0604246M ER -
@article{ author = "Milutinović, Jovana and Nedeljković, Nenad and Nikolić, Predrag", year = "2006", abstract = "Aim: The aim of this research was to compare the standard and computerized method of cephalogram analysis. In this research 32 patients visiting Belgrade University School of Dentistry, dept. of orthodontics were involved. Material and Method: This research was based on cephalogram analysis for every patient. All of the cephalograms were analyzed in two ways: 1. standrad method and 2. computerized method using Nemotec Dental Studio NX 2005 software. Results: Additional possibilities and properties of computer software for the computerized cephalogram analysis caused the differences in results. Conclusion: Based on the results, it can be concluded that there was no statistical difference comparing both methods. Computerized cephalogram analysis provides higher speed and software possibilities compared to standard method., Cilj: Cilj ovog istraživanja je bio da se uporedi standardni i kompjuterski metod analize profilnog telerendgen snimka glave. Materijal i metod: Istraživanjem je obuhvaćeno ukupno 32 pacijenta Klinike za Ortopediju vilica, Stomatološkog fakulteta u Beogradu. Istraživanje se zasnivalo na analizi profilnog telerendgen snimka glave svakog pacijenta. Svi snimci su analizirani na dva načina: 1. standardnom metodom analize i 2. kompjuterskom metodom pomoću programa Nemotek Dental Studio NX 2005. Rezultati: Razlika u rezultatima dobijena je zbog bolje vidljivosti anatomskih detalja na snimku analiziranom kompjuterskom metodom zbog mogućnosti raznih podešavanja i poboljšanja vidljivosti. Zaključak: Na osnovu dobijenih rezultata može se zaključiti da nema statistički značajne razlike u podacima dobijenim pomoću oba metoda, neuporedivo je brža analiza pomoću kompjuterskog programa i mogućnosti koje pruža kompjuterska analiza prevazilazi okvire standardne analize.", publisher = "Srpsko lekarsko društvo - Stomatološka sekcija, Beograd", journal = "Stomatološki glasnik Srbije", title = "Comparative analysis of standard and computerized profile cephalometric diagnostics in orthodontics, Uporedna analiza standardne i kompjuterske metode telerendgen dijagnostike u ortopediji vilica", volume = "53", number = "4", pages = "246-252", doi = "10.2298/SGS0604246M" }
Milutinović, J., Nedeljković, N.,& Nikolić, P.. (2006). Comparative analysis of standard and computerized profile cephalometric diagnostics in orthodontics. in Stomatološki glasnik Srbije Srpsko lekarsko društvo - Stomatološka sekcija, Beograd., 53(4), 246-252. https://doi.org/10.2298/SGS0604246M
Milutinović J, Nedeljković N, Nikolić P. Comparative analysis of standard and computerized profile cephalometric diagnostics in orthodontics. in Stomatološki glasnik Srbije. 2006;53(4):246-252. doi:10.2298/SGS0604246M .
Milutinović, Jovana, Nedeljković, Nenad, Nikolić, Predrag, "Comparative analysis of standard and computerized profile cephalometric diagnostics in orthodontics" in Stomatološki glasnik Srbije, 53, no. 4 (2006):246-252, https://doi.org/10.2298/SGS0604246M . .