Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorMarković, Aleksa
dc.creatorMišić, Tijana
dc.creatorMancić, Dragan
dc.creatorJovanović, Igor
dc.creatorŠćepanović, Miodrag
dc.creatorJezdić, Zoran
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-02T12:49:38Z
dc.date.available2020-07-02T12:49:38Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161
dc.identifier.urihttps://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1877
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To compare the effect of two surgical techniques, lateral condensation and bone drilling, on changes in temperature of the adjacent low-density bone during implant placement into posterior maxilla and to investigate the influence of the host factors - age, gender, region of implantation, bone density, and thickness of the cortical bone at the recipient sites. Material and methods: Local bone temperature was measured thermographically during implant placement into posterior maxilla following lateral bone condensing (test group) or bone drilling (controls). The main study outcomes were baseline bone temperature prior to implantation and maximum bone temperature recorded during implantation. Early implant success was evaluated after 6 months of healing. Results: A total of 40 implants were randomly allocated to test and control groups and placed into maxillary premolar and/or molar region of 18 participants of both genders and average age of 51.74 years. All recorded bone temperatures were below the threshold for thermal necrosis. Although both groups showed significant increase in bone temperature during implant placement procedure (P lt = 0.0005), it was significantly higher for bone condensing compared with drilling (P lt = 0.0005; 3.79 +/- 1.54 degrees C; 1.91 +/- 0.70 degrees C respectively). No host factor was singled out as a significant predictor of bone temperature changes, although trend of higher increase was observed in young patients, regardless of gender, during implant placement procedure into maxillary first premolar region with bone density type 3 and cortical layer thicker than 1 mm. Early implant success rate after 6 months follow-up was 100%. Conclusion: Although both surgical techniques, bone condensing and bone drilling, can be considered safe regarding their thermal effect on the bone of posterior maxilla, bone drilling is associated with fewer local bone heating during implantation. Host factors do not affect the bone thermal changes significantly.en
dc.publisherWiley, Hoboken
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Basic Research (BR or ON)/174028/RS//
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Integrated and Interdisciplinary Research (IIR or III)/41008/RS//
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceClinical Oral Implants Research
dc.subjectbone condensingen
dc.subjectbone drillingen
dc.subjectimplant placementen
dc.subjectlow-density boneen
dc.subjectreal-time thermographyen
dc.titleReal-time thermographic analysis of low-density bone during implant placement: a randomized parallel-group clinical study comparing lateral condensation with bone drilling surgical techniqueen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dcterms.abstractМарковић, Aлекса; Јовановић, Игор; Јездић, Зоран; Мишић, Тијана; Шћепановић, Миодраг; Манцић, Драган;
dc.citation.volume25
dc.citation.issue8
dc.citation.spage910
dc.citation.epage918
dc.citation.other25(8): 910-918
dc.citation.rankaM21
dc.identifier.wos000339388500005
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/clr.12191
dc.identifier.pmid23710900
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84903878114
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу