Clinical Performance of a Glass-Hybrid System Compared with a Resin Composite in the Posterior Region: Results of a 2-year Multicenter Study
Нема приказа
Аутори
Miletić, IvanaBaraba, Anja
Basso, Matteo
Pulcini, Maria Giulia
Marković, Dejan
Perić, Tamara
Ozkaya, Cigdem Atalayin
Turkun, Lezize Sebnem
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
Purpose: To compare the clinical performance of a glass hybrid restorative system, EQUIA Forte, with that of a nanohybrid resin composite, Tetric EvoCeram, in two-surface class II cavities. Materials and Methods: This multicenter, randomized controlled clinical study was conducted at four different dental schools. In total, 360 restorations were placed in patients in need of two class-II, two-surface restorations in the molar region of the same jaw. Each patient received one glass hybrid restoration (EQUIA Forte, GC) and one resin composite restoration (Tetric EvoCeram, Ivoclar Vivadent). Two independent evaluators performed a clinical evaluation of each site after 1 week (baseline), 1 year, and 2 years using the criteria of the FDI World Dental Federation (FDI-2). Results: The estimated survival rates at the 2-year recall were 93.6% and 94.5% for EQUIA Forte and Tetric EvoCeram, respectively. There were no significant differences in the survival rates or in any of the evaluated esthet...ic, functional or biological properties between EQUIA Forte and Tetric EvoCeram restorations (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Both the glass-hybrid restorative system and nanohybrid resin composite showed good clinical performance in moderate to large two-surface class II restorations in a 2-year follow-up.
Кључне речи:
clinical trials / resin composite / glass-hybrid system / multicenter / split-mouthИзвор:
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 2020, 22, 3, 235-247Издавач:
- Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, Hanover Park
Финансирање / пројекти:
- University of Zagreb
DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a44547
ISSN: 1461-5185
PubMed: 32435764
WoS: 000535962600002
Scopus: 2-s2.0-85085155921
Колекције
Институција/група
Stomatološki fakultetTY - JOUR AU - Miletić, Ivana AU - Baraba, Anja AU - Basso, Matteo AU - Pulcini, Maria Giulia AU - Marković, Dejan AU - Perić, Tamara AU - Ozkaya, Cigdem Atalayin AU - Turkun, Lezize Sebnem PY - 2020 UR - https://smile.stomf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2476 AB - Purpose: To compare the clinical performance of a glass hybrid restorative system, EQUIA Forte, with that of a nanohybrid resin composite, Tetric EvoCeram, in two-surface class II cavities. Materials and Methods: This multicenter, randomized controlled clinical study was conducted at four different dental schools. In total, 360 restorations were placed in patients in need of two class-II, two-surface restorations in the molar region of the same jaw. Each patient received one glass hybrid restoration (EQUIA Forte, GC) and one resin composite restoration (Tetric EvoCeram, Ivoclar Vivadent). Two independent evaluators performed a clinical evaluation of each site after 1 week (baseline), 1 year, and 2 years using the criteria of the FDI World Dental Federation (FDI-2). Results: The estimated survival rates at the 2-year recall were 93.6% and 94.5% for EQUIA Forte and Tetric EvoCeram, respectively. There were no significant differences in the survival rates or in any of the evaluated esthetic, functional or biological properties between EQUIA Forte and Tetric EvoCeram restorations (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Both the glass-hybrid restorative system and nanohybrid resin composite showed good clinical performance in moderate to large two-surface class II restorations in a 2-year follow-up. PB - Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, Hanover Park T2 - Journal of Adhesive Dentistry T1 - Clinical Performance of a Glass-Hybrid System Compared with a Resin Composite in the Posterior Region: Results of a 2-year Multicenter Study VL - 22 IS - 3 SP - 235 EP - 247 DO - 10.3290/j.jad.a44547 ER -
@article{ author = "Miletić, Ivana and Baraba, Anja and Basso, Matteo and Pulcini, Maria Giulia and Marković, Dejan and Perić, Tamara and Ozkaya, Cigdem Atalayin and Turkun, Lezize Sebnem", year = "2020", abstract = "Purpose: To compare the clinical performance of a glass hybrid restorative system, EQUIA Forte, with that of a nanohybrid resin composite, Tetric EvoCeram, in two-surface class II cavities. Materials and Methods: This multicenter, randomized controlled clinical study was conducted at four different dental schools. In total, 360 restorations were placed in patients in need of two class-II, two-surface restorations in the molar region of the same jaw. Each patient received one glass hybrid restoration (EQUIA Forte, GC) and one resin composite restoration (Tetric EvoCeram, Ivoclar Vivadent). Two independent evaluators performed a clinical evaluation of each site after 1 week (baseline), 1 year, and 2 years using the criteria of the FDI World Dental Federation (FDI-2). Results: The estimated survival rates at the 2-year recall were 93.6% and 94.5% for EQUIA Forte and Tetric EvoCeram, respectively. There were no significant differences in the survival rates or in any of the evaluated esthetic, functional or biological properties between EQUIA Forte and Tetric EvoCeram restorations (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Both the glass-hybrid restorative system and nanohybrid resin composite showed good clinical performance in moderate to large two-surface class II restorations in a 2-year follow-up.", publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, Hanover Park", journal = "Journal of Adhesive Dentistry", title = "Clinical Performance of a Glass-Hybrid System Compared with a Resin Composite in the Posterior Region: Results of a 2-year Multicenter Study", volume = "22", number = "3", pages = "235-247", doi = "10.3290/j.jad.a44547" }
Miletić, I., Baraba, A., Basso, M., Pulcini, M. G., Marković, D., Perić, T., Ozkaya, C. A.,& Turkun, L. S.. (2020). Clinical Performance of a Glass-Hybrid System Compared with a Resin Composite in the Posterior Region: Results of a 2-year Multicenter Study. in Journal of Adhesive Dentistry Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, Hanover Park., 22(3), 235-247. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a44547
Miletić I, Baraba A, Basso M, Pulcini MG, Marković D, Perić T, Ozkaya CA, Turkun LS. Clinical Performance of a Glass-Hybrid System Compared with a Resin Composite in the Posterior Region: Results of a 2-year Multicenter Study. in Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2020;22(3):235-247. doi:10.3290/j.jad.a44547 .
Miletić, Ivana, Baraba, Anja, Basso, Matteo, Pulcini, Maria Giulia, Marković, Dejan, Perić, Tamara, Ozkaya, Cigdem Atalayin, Turkun, Lezize Sebnem, "Clinical Performance of a Glass-Hybrid System Compared with a Resin Composite in the Posterior Region: Results of a 2-year Multicenter Study" in Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 22, no. 3 (2020):235-247, https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a44547 . .